Behaviourist therapies assume phobias are learnt associations and attempt to replace the fear association with relaxation.
Reciprocal inhibition
Fear and relaxation are two antagonistic emotions, as you can't feel twoopposite emotions simultaneously. If the therapist can help the client hold the phobic object without fear, they have been successfully counter-conditioned.
Systematicdesensitisation
Therapist teachesrelaxation techniques like breathing exercises.
Client creates anxietyhierarchy from the least to mostfeared to do with the phobic object.
Client completes each stage of the anxietyhierarchy - lowest to highest - must be relaxed at each stage.
When the client can hold the phobic object without fear, the association is extinct, and a newassociation with relaxation is formed.
Flooding
Flooding attempts to countercondition a phobia by immediate and full exposure to the maximum level of phobic stimulus.
Immediate exposure is expected to cause extremepanic response in the client. The therapist's job is to stop the client from escaping the situation.
A fear response takes energy so the client will become exhausted and calm down in the presence of the object - learns the phobic object is harmless.
+ Lowrelapserate from systematicdesensitisation
E - Gilroy found that clients with a spider phobia showed lessphobicbehaviours than a control group from 3 months to 33 months later.
E - This suggests that systematic desensitisation is effective at permanently removing phobias
L - Therefore, the treatment is valid.
+ Sideeffects of systematicdesensitisation
E - Patients prefersystematicdesensitisation to flooding as they seem that it could be traumatising. Flooding can cause the patient to experience severe distress, whereas systematic desensitisation involves a gradualexpose and also includes some elements that are positive for the patient (e.g. learning relaxation procedures).
E - This is reflected in lowrefusal rates and low attrition rates.
L - Therefore, it is a successful therapy because it has lessadverse side effects compared to alternatives.
/ Timetaken for systematicdesensitisation
E - Systematic desensitisation is a slowprocess. On average, it takes between 6 and 8sessions.
E -It may be too slow for people who may need to overcome a fear quickly, because it may be worsening their quality of life.
L - Therefore, it may be uneffective and could cause highdropout rates.
+ Lowrelapserate from flooding
E - Flooding has verylowrelapse rates. Thom found when flooding was compared to drugs, when treating dental phobia, no clients from the flooding group demonstrated any symptoms in later appointments.
E - Flooding is effective at permanently reducing phobias.
L - Therefore, is a valid treatment.
+ Timetaken for flooding
E - Ougrin: Studies comparing flooding to cognitive therapies have found that flooding is highly effective and quicker than alternatives.
E - The quick effect means that patients are free of their symptoms as soon as possible and makes the treatment cheaper.
L - Therefore, it is effective as other treatments for specific phobias and does so quicker.
/ Effectiveness of flooding
E - Although flooding is highlyeffective for treatingsimple phobias, it appears to be less effective for more complex phobias (e.g. social phobias).
E - Flooding cannot be applied to all phobias, therefore.
L - However, certainphobias may benefit from cognitivetechniques more, because such therapies tackle irrational thinking.
/ Sideeffects of flooding
E - Flooding is a highly traumaticexperience. Patients are often unwilling to see flooding through to the end because of the extreme distress they experience.
E - This means time and money are sometimes wasted preparing patients only to have them refuse to start or complete treatment.
L - Therefore, flooding may be an ineffective treatment and leads to highdropout rates, wasting money which effects the economy.