Evaluating the reliability and usefulness of historical sources
Values and limitations of sources need to be considered when studying history
Steve Biko: 'Basically Black Consciousness refers itself to the black man and to his situation, and I think the Black man is subjected to two forces in this country.'
Black Consciousness
It was a continuation of the struggle for national liberation in South Africa
It had a different approach and methods/tactics compared to previous movements
The vision was the same - to liberate the oppressed black majority from white supremacy
When the ANC and PAC were banned
They went underground and formed resistance armies (Umkhonto we Sizwe and POQO)
During 1968-1977
It was a brutal and cruel time for liberation movements, with thousands going into exile and others imprisoned
When Black Consciousness came into the picture in the late 1960s
The government initially allowed it to operate, thinking it aligned with apartheid's separate development ideology
Oppression of the black man
External through institutionalised machinery (laws, work conditions, poor education)
Internal through self-rejection and equating 'good' with 'white'
No source is truly unbiased, there will always be an element of bias
The reliability of a source is analysed based on four components: bias, origin, intention, and limitations
Bias
An inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group, especially in a way considered to be unfair
Bias needs to be considered in each of the components when analysing a source's reliability
Origin
Where the source comes from, which affects its reliability
When discussing origin, always mention the bias of a source
Intention
Why the source has been made (to inform, honour, criticise, persuade, educate)