how does Theravada regard Siddartha Gautama and how does Mahayana?
T: regarded as founder and central spiritual figure (taking refuge in the Buddha). he is an inspiration and role model for Dharma
M: anyone can be a Buddha as everyone has 'innerBuddhanature'. Buddha is a concept. Believe Siddartha Gautama was a Bodhisattva and so did not enter pari-Nirvana. he was enlightened before he lived his life as Gautama and his historical life/incarnation is seen as a skill in means as an aid to teach people the Dharma and help suffering beings. known as Shakymuni Buddha.
- Nirvana is attained and the final five fetters (desire for existence in a world of forms, desire for existence in a formless world, conceit, restlessness and ignorance) have been extinguished
- all craving and desire has been extinguished, the path has been realised and no further rebirths are necessary
Arhat: Theravadaideal, must renounce and become a monastic, individual path, anybody can enter monastic order, no use of celestial beings, can be seen as elitist and you renounce from the worldly life and traditional physical labour, escapes from rebirth by attaining Nirvana
Bodhisattva: Mahayana ideal and seen as superior, can still lead householder life, wants to help all beings, Bodhisattvas get a calling so is not for everyone although it's open to all, uses a variety of mythical beings to understand the Dharma, Bodhisattva comes in many forms which suit different people and Bodhisattva can enter monastic order but doesn't have to, Mahayana monks tend to focus on physical labour as good discipline, deferentry into pari-Nirvana and choose to be reborn