1 - common remedies

Cards (16)

    • damages are available by right when there is a breach of contract
  • specific performance is where the court orders someone to do what they promised to do in the contract, it is not available by rights
  • the primary obligation is a non legal statement made by the parties that shows an agreement for an economic exchange
  • the secondary obligation is a legally enforceable contract, if this is breached there must be a remedy
  • if you enter a contract to sell £1million of steel and it costs £900,000 to buy the steel, you expect a profit of £100,000 (expectation interest), if buyer rejects the steel after the contract been signed but you haven't bought the steel yet, you are owed £100,000. if you paid the £900,000 for steel, you can be owed £1million (reliance interest)
  • damages = expectation + reliance
  • when a party sustains a loss by a reason of breach of contract, he is to be placed in the position he would have been in had the contract been performed (expectation interest)
  • Robinson v Harmon
    • 21 year lease, H thought he owned the property (he didnt - it was vested in trustees) so he leased out the building to R. When R comes to take possession of the house, H refused to complete the lease as he found out the property was worth more than he was leasing it out for. R paid £20 in the preparation of the lease and lost out on profit because of the breach. H paid £25 to court and claimed there was no need for further damages. Held, R recovered damages for the loss of the bargain (other party placed in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed)
  • losses
    A) fact
    B) law
    C) unavoidable
    D) avoidable
    E) mitigation
    • claimant must show the breach caused the loss (cause in fact) - these are certain losses and are recoverable
    • if claimant cannot prove in fact that the breach caused the losses, these losses are uncertain and unrecoverable
    • After proving in fact, the D is liable for the losses which they had in their reasonable contemplation at the time of the agreement (proximate losses - recoverable)
    • Remote losses are caused by D but outside of the reasonable contemplation at the time of agreement and are not recoverable
    • If the D could have reasonably avoided the losses then they must do so (mitigation)
    • Avoidable losses are not recoverable
    • Unavoidable losses are recoverable
  • Haddeley and Baxendale
    • H operate flour mill in Greenwich, needs repairs, B took crankshaft to repair - mill not operational at this time (B unaware of this), delivered it back a week late, H claimed damages for lost profits in the week, B said unreasonable as he was not aware of the closure and thus the lost profits. Held B not liable for damages as he had not reasonably foreseen delays and H had not informed him of the crucialness of the crankshaft. (can only be liable for damages that were within D reasonable contemplation at the time of the agreement)
  • First rule in compensatory damages - Robinson and Harmon - put the claimant in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed
  • Second rule in compensatory damages - Campbells rule - put the claimant in the position they would have been in had the contract been performed but done so at the least cost to the defendant (mitigation)
  • can breach contract without any liability if the market prices are the same as the original sales price - there is no loss