Save
LHRD 3071
Exam 2
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Learn
Created by
Ingrid Lindblad
Visit profile
Subdecks (1)
Exam 2 - jeopardy
LHRD 3071 > Exam 2
52 cards
Cards (125)
Reasons for change
New
leadership
Corrosive
behavior within the organization
Unplanned
change
Planned
change
Kurt Lewin
Father
of
change
management
German-American
psychologist
Unfreeze,
change
,
freeze
concept, 1947
ADKAR model
Awareness
Desire
Knowledge
Ability
Reinforcement
Current
state
Transition
State --> toughest period of change
Future
State
Five dysfunctions of a team
Absece of
trust
Fear of
conflict
Lack of
commitment
Avoidance of
accountability
Inattention to
results
Absence of
trust
Not been
open
to one another
Not showing
weaknesses
Building trust requires
vulnerability
Fear
of conflict
Not
debating
about things that matter
Healthy
conflict involves debate
Lack
of commitment
Not
explaining all opinions
Hear
all sides before making a decision
Avoidance
of accountability
Responsibilities
of each team member
Accountability requires previous
commitment
Inattention
to results
Look at their own
interests
instead of the
team's
Focus should be on delivering
measurable
results
Feedback
model
Situation
Behavior
Impact
Next steps
Consequences
of not managing change
Less
productivity
Resistance
from
employees
Turnover
of valuable
employees
Disinterest
in
future
More
sick days
Want to go back to
old
ways of doing things
To lead change
You will be
stressed
Never let your employees see you are
stressed
You and your business could be at stake
It's difficult to lead change
Practical
approach
before change
Collect data first
Advantages
Disadvantages
Who benefits from current situation
Write down what you want to know
Write down goals
Kotter's eight stages of change
Create a sense of
urgency
Build a
guiding coalition
Form a
strategic vision
and initiatives
Enlist a
volunteer army
Enable action by removing
barriers
Generate
short-term
wins
Sustain
acceleration
Institute
change
Kirkpatrick's four level training evaluation model
Reaction
Learning
Impact
Results
Dr. Donald L.
Kirkpatrick
University of
Wisconsin
Developed the
training
model
Limitation
of the Kirkpatrick model
No
relationship
between the
levels
Level 1 and 2 are subject to
bias
Many organizations only implement level
1
and
2
No
performance improvement interventions
Return
on
investment
(ROI)
(How much money gained as a results of training - how much money did the training cost) / (how much money did the training cost) X 100
Anderson's value of learning model
2006
HRM and HRD consulting
Importance of
alignment
Need to improve training to increase production
Anderson's
value of learning model
Current alignment against strategic priorities
Use a range of methods to assess and evaluate the contribution of learning
Establish the most relevant approaches for your organization
ADDIE model
Analyze
Design
Develop
Implement
Evaluate
4 phases in conducting an effective training needs analysis
Understanding
short
and
long-term
business goals
Identify the desire performance outcomes
Knowledge
Skills
Abilities
Examine the current performance outcomes and identity gaps
Establish and prioritize a solution
Quantitative
Surveys
/
questionnaires
Qualitative
Focus groups
Interviews
Observations
Document review
Research
into
best practices
What is
performance
management?
Management is the ability to get things done through others
Managing performance is managing the
efficacy
of each employee
Myths
around performance management and feedback
Performance reviews should only be given once a year
High performance don't need performance reviews, they are better left undisturbed
Feedback is always effective
Poor performance is always the employees' fault
Every employee is judged fairly
Manage and improve employee performance
Set clear
expectations
Train
managers
Discipline
Ensure managers are being consistent in their application of company policies
Give employees the power to do their jobs well
Employees should have input into their goals and objectives
Job satisfaction
Moderately related to job performance
Micari
and
Pazos
study in 2012
Student-faculty
relationship positively predicted grade as well as
confidence
Contributors to job
satisfaction
/ organizational
commitment
Affection for your job
Sense of
obligation
to stay
Fear of
loss
Defining job performance -
results
Numbers of cases won/lost, monthly sales
Results are
measurable
Defining job performance -
behaviors
Communicating
in a professional manner, following through on
costumer
requests
Behaviors should be
defined
Assessing
behavior and results, not traits
Focus on behaviors and results, not on traits or personal characteristics
Unfortunately rates are influenced by traits
Multiple methods to assess behavior and results
Objective
assessment
Use results for outcome
Subjective
assessment
Comparing to model standard
Dealing with the
problem
employee
Multiple attempts and no improvement, situations needs to change
Termination is not always the answer
Termination should not be a shock to the employee
Diagnose the problem first
Hold a performance improvement discussion
Train employees
Recognition and reinforcement
- managing the star
May possess an overdeveloped sense of entitlement
External rewards and not intrinsic motivation
Difficult seeing other's contribution
Allocate more resources to problem employees
Managers need to create challenges for star employees
Do not overuse star employee - may lead to burnout
If we need training - who is attending these conversations around potential training?
Ourselves
and the
T&D
consultant
Potential trainee
(s)
Immediate supervisor
Executive
Prior to conducting training -
preparations
Work that
permits
new insight
Explain
reasons
for the program
Define
success
Reinforce
application
of new behaviors
Solutions to training needs
Existing
programs
Self-study
programs
Special
assignments
Coaching
or mentoring
Networking
Self-study
programs
Individual training needs
Visit or field trip
Planning session is a must
Follow-up
Hybrid courses
See all 125 cards