Legal practitioners are experts who are familiar with civil law, preparing and conducting a case and presenting it to achieve the best outcome for their client
Legal practitioners are needed because:
A party will usually not know how to present their case in a civil trial without legal representation (evidence/cross-examine)
They may be too emotionally invested to be objective
If one party is represented or better represented than the other this could lead to an unfair advantage/incorrect outcome
Court and j/m can offer some assistance to a self-represented party, but they cannot advocate on behalf of the party.
Some dispute resolution bodies are designed so that legal practitioners are not needed
Legal Aid
Obtaining legal aid is harder - VLA generally prioritise grants of legal assistance for criminal and family law matters.
VLA are also limited in the advice they can give and do not give advice on every type of case e.g. business matters, work injuries, pay disputes.
CLCs may be able to help but it depends on the CLC and their expertise and capacity to be able to help.
Strengths of Legal Practitioners:
Legal practitioners are experts who can help the parties navigate the civil justice system.
Legal practitioners bring objectivity in decision-making, such as whether to agree to settle with the other party.
Legal practitioners can help avoid delays that may arise with self-represented parties.
Weaknesses of Legal Practitioners:
Not all legal practitioners are equally experienced or skilled which can impact the quality of legal services.
Not everyone is able to afford legal representation and may be forced to self-represent. They also may struggle to obtain free or subsidised legal aid.
Even if a self-represented party can afford a lawyer, this could potentially be at great expense, particularly if they lose and are ordered to pay some of the other party’s legal costs too.