Paper One

Cards (48)

  • Assault
    Defined under s39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
  • Actus reus of assault
    • Causing the victim to apprehend or fear immediate unlawful violence
  • Mens rea of assault

    Intention to cause the actus reus
  • Battery
    Defined in s39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988
  • Actus reus of battery
    • Inflicting unlawful application of force on another
  • Mens rea of battery

    Intention or subjective recklessness to inflicting unlawful personal violence
  • Section 47 offence

    Defined under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861
  • Actus reus of s47

    • Assault or battery causing actual bodily harm
  • Mens rea of s47

    Intention to or subjective recklessness to subject to unlawful force
  • Section 20 offence

    Defined under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861
  • Actus reus of s20
    • Causing grievous bodily harm
  • Mens rea of s20

    Intention for their act to result in unlawful bodily harm
  • Section 18 offence

    Defined under the Offences Against the Person Act 1861
  • Actus reus of s18
    • Causing grievous bodily harm
  • Mens rea of s18

    Intention to do some grievous bodily harm
  • Murder
    Defined by Sir Edwards Coke as the unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being and under the king's peace with malice aforethought expressed or implied
  • Actus reus of murder
    • Unlawful killing of a reasonable person in being and under the king's peace
  • Mens rea of murder

    Malice aforethought, expressed or implied
  • Unlawful act manslaughter

    Defendant performs a dangerous and unlawful act
  • Actus reus of unlawful act manslaughter

    • Unlawful act
    • Dangerous act (objective standard)
  • Gross negligence manslaughter

    Death is a result of a grossly negligent act or omission on the part of the defendant
  • Actus reus of gross negligence manslaughter

    • Defendant owed a duty of care to the victim
    • Defendant negligently breached that duty of care
    • Serious and obvious risk of death was reasonably foreseeable
    • Breach caused or made a significant contribution to the death
    • Circumstances of the breach were truly exceptionally bad
  • Theft
    Defined under S1 of the Theft Act 1968 as someone who dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with intention to permanently deprive the other of it
  • Actus reus of theft

    • Appropriation of property belonging to another
  • Mens rea of theft

    Dishonest intention to permanently deprive the other of the property
  • Robbery
    Defined under s8 Theft Act 1968 as the use of force on any person or seeking to put any person in fear of being subjected to force at the time of the theft
  • Actus reus of robbery

    • Use of force or putting or seeking to put any person in fear
  • Mens rea of robbery

    Mens rea for theft and intention to use force to steal
  • Attempt
    Defined under s1 of the Criminal Attempts act 1981 as when a person does more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence with intent
  • Actus reus of attempt

    • Defendant does an act that is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence
  • Mens rea of attempt

    Intention to commit a full offence
  • Transferred malice

    When the defendant misses their intended target
  • Factual causation

    'But for' test
  • Legal causation

    'Operating and substantial' test
  • Breaks in chain of causation

    • Intervening acts
    • Thin skull rule
    • Victim's own act
  • Loss of control defence

    Defined under s54 of the Coroner's and Justice Act 2009, where the defendant must prove a loss of self-control
  • Requirements for loss of control defence

    • Qualifying trigger (s55 CJA 2009)
    • Defendant retaliated with reasonable force as anyone suffering from the same loss of control
  • Diminished responsibility defence

    Defined under s2 of the Homicide Act 1957 and amended by s52 of the Coroner's and Justice Act 2009, where the defendant must prove that they were suffering from an abnormality of mental functioning which arise from a recognised medical condition
  • Requirements for diminished responsibility defence

    • Abnormality of mental functioning substantially impaired the defendant's ability to understand the nature of their conduct, form a rational judgement or exercise self-control
    • Abnormality caused the defendant to carry out the killing or was a significant factor
  • Duress defence
    When the defendant is forced to conduct criminal activity