bowlby proposed evolutionary explanation of attachment - attachment was an innate system that gives a survival advantage
bowlbys theory is described as monotropic because emphasis places of childs attachment to one particular caregiver
bowlby's monotropic theory believed childs attachment to particular caregiver (mother) is different and more important than the others
more time spent with the mother figure the better - suggested principles to clarify
law on continuity - more constant and predictable child care the better quality of attachment
low of accumulated separation - effects of every separation from mother adds up - safest = 0
social releasers are series of innate 'cute' behaviours that babies are born with - smiling, cooing and gripping - encourage attention from adults
purpose of social releasers is to activate adult attachment system - make adult feel love towards baby
bowlby proposed there is critical period of around 2 years when infant attachment system is active
viewed it as 'sensitive period'
if attachment isnt formed by around 2 - theyll find it hard to form bonds later on
bowlby argued child forms mental representation of their relationship with primary caregiver named internal working model which acts as a template for what relationships are like
the internal working model have a powerful effect on attachment in early years and childs future relationships
internal working model affects childs later ability to parent themselves - individual tend to base their parenting behaviour on own experiences when they were being parented
continuity hypothesis is the idea that later relationships are influenced by earlier experiences of attachment - seen to continue through generations
Monotropy
Social releasers
Critical period
Internal working model
Continuity hypothesis
evaluation for Bowlby's monotropic theory
evidence for continuity hypothesis
sensitive rather than critical period
evidence supporting monotropy
evidence for continuity hypothesis (+)
research support from minnesota parent child study which heightens Bowlby's claims for continuity hypothesis
researchers followed ptts from infancy to later adolescence and found continuity between early attachments and later social/emotional later on
supports bowlby's continuity hypothesis as it demonstrates a clear link between early and later attachment
strengthens bowlbys explanation of attachment
sensitive rather than critical period (-)
idea of there being critical period of 2 years for an attachment to form is criticised
rutter et al found infants are still able to form attachment outside of critical period
researchers now use term 'sensitive period' which illustrates the possibility infants can form attachment bonds after 6 months
suggests bowlbys original idea of having 'critical period' was not accurate
limiting theory and its future application
evidence supporting monotropy (+)
strength of bowlbys theory is there is evidence to support monotropy having role in formation of attachment
researchers concluded hierarchical model of attachment (emphasises one central person whos 'higher' than the others) is ore likely than multiple attachments
central person has significance and contributes to healthy emotional development
supports bowlbys concepts of monotropy and idea that there is special attachment which plays huge significant role in emotional development