Positive and negative reinforcement in television adverts aimed at children
Rewards- Children getting attention from friends for having a particular product. Aimed at parents- get the toy to remove children's upset/pestering behaviour.
Rewards- Children seeing how happy the toy will make them.
Owen and Padron (2015) analysed the content of voiced narratives in ads for action figures aimed at girls ('Bratz') and boys ('Batman')
Bratz ads - included many words related to fantasy and appearance ('sparkly', 'dreamy')
Batman ads - included more aggressive and power-related language and more references to science
Limiting gender roles in advertising limits children's ideas about how they play and what they play with, which may ultimately limit the types of roles they will try out as adults (Smith, 1994)
Owen and Padron (2015) suggest that gender-stereotyped language of ads aimed at children may affect how they perceive gender roles, 'normalising' stereotyped behaviour, especially as the researchers claim that children tend to accept media representations without evaluating them
Some companies are moving away from advertising using stereotypical gender roles (e.g. Toys R Us in Sweden) but many won't, for fear of reduced profitability.
Children are being told that there is gender equality by teachers and parents, however, the language used in adverts and life does not support this
Children accept these roles, language and behaviour at face value without challenging them
Ads reinforce the language used by boys and girls- boys use terms that relate to power, girls like to talk
Standardised procedures - adverts were all classified in the same way (e.g. using the same 5 different verb elements) and these were mostly clear, unambiguous and did not overlap
Some subjectivity involved, as researchers are deciding which category different verbs belonged to. Some concepts are hard to operationalise, e.g. the 'aggressiveness' and 'sing-songness' of an ad voice-over is very subjective
Some elements of the study were tested by independent raters as well as the researchers (to check for inter-rater reliability) although this was only done for a sample of the research, not all of it
The sample of ads may not be representative of all advertising aimed at children because ads were all from children's cartoon programmes
Children may be presented with quite different gender representations in ads aimed at adults or a family audience
Two sources were excluded (Disney Channel and Cartoon network) because they were subscription only channels. The audience for these channels may have been wealthier or have other characteristics which meant that ads aimed at them were different from the ones in the study
Interactionist view of the impact of TV advertising
Children's internal cognitive processes can also influence how they respond to what they see in adverts. For example, a girl who expects to be rewarded for acting in accordance with her stereotypical gender role may be more likely to be influenced by what she see in adverts
The topic of gender stereotyping could be controversial – should gender differences be encouraged or downplayed in children?
Different viewpoints would provide arguments for both, and researchers should be aware how politicians and the media (or indeed any other organisation) could use their results for their own purposes
Also – should advertisers care about gender stereotyping. Shouldn't they be allowed to market/sell/advertise their products as they wish?
Films and computer games now have a rating to try and ensure that children don't see age-inappropriate material, as for younger children it may be copied and cause harm
Parent-child conflict arises out of children becoming aware of advertised brands and developing a preference for one over the other, then requesting or demanding their parents buy them
When children see ads, they see people who have achieved fulfilment through buying certain products. If children compare their own lives to what they see in ads, they experience dissatisfaction because the contrast is overwhelming
Advertisers need to create a market for products, such as children's toys, and to do this they use messages that draw on and perpetuate existing dominant ideas about gender, ethnicity and class
Browne also found that in adverts with both genders, the boys tended to be more dominant and were more likely to demonstrate or explain something, portraying boys as more knowledgeable
Limiting gender roles in advertising limits children's ideas about how they play and what they play with, which may ultimately limit the types of roles they will try out as adults
In total 188 toy adverts were recorded. When combined across all years, adverts for boy-orientated toys (102) outnumbered those orientated towards girls (63) with relatively few non-specific gender adverts (23)
55% of the girl-oriented and 53% of the boy/girl-oriented ads included speech from an on-screen character, but this figure was only 26% for boy-oriented ads
Gender exaggeration was heard in 80% of the adverts for boys and 87% of adverts for girls, and unsurprisingly there tended to be no exaggeration in toys aimed for both boys and girls
TV advertising has been heavily criticised by organisations such as the Food Standards Agency (FSA) for encouraging unhealthy eating habits and obesity in young people