Reason for ethnic minority pupils' underachievement
CD theorists say ethnic minority pupils lack intellectual stimulation and enriching experiences, making them ill-prepared for school and likely to fail
Bereiter & Engelmann say the language spoken by black families is ungrammatical/disjointed and doesn't express abstract ideas, so it's inadequate for educational success
Concerns about EAL students falling behind are dismissed, and Gillborn & Mirza (2000) say Indian pupils excel despite English being their second language
Sewell's theory on black boys' underachievement
Lack of fatherly nurturing/tough love (firm, fair respectful discipline)
Turning to street gangs where they get perverse loyalty & love, with the male role model being one of anti-school black masculinity
Sewell says black boys' underachievement comes from their cultural differences in socialisation and poor attitude to education
Academic black boys are labelled 'sell-outs' and subject to peer pressure by the gangs
Gillborn (2008) says the issue isn't peer pressure, it's institutional racism in the education system that is reproducing black boys' failure
Sewell's theory on Asian pupils' achievement
Supportive families that place high value in education
Asian work ethic
Lupton (2004) says the adult authority in Asian families is like the ones in school, where children's respect to adults is expected, which has a knock-on effect to school as Asian parents are more likely to support the behaviour policies
Cultural deprivation theory on lack of motivation in black pupils
They aren't socialised into the mainstream culture - ambition, competitiveness, sacrifices for future goals
They are socialised into a fatalistic live for today attitude that doesn't value education
McCulloch (2014) found that ethnic minorities aspire to university more than the white working class
Lupton found that teachers blame lack of parental support for white working class pupils' failure, as they had no poverty markers (FSM)
Evans (2006) argues that white working class street culture is brutal, so pupils learn to withstand intimidation & intimidate others, which they take into school, making it a power game that causes disruption and therefore educational failure
Cultural deprivation theory on family structure and parental support
Failing to properly socialise children comes from having a dysfunctional family structure
Black lone mothers struggle without a breadwinner and male role model, so children are deprived of care and model of male achievement, making them inadequate parents themselves
Murray (1984) argues high rates of lone parents and lack of male role models leads to minorities' underachievement
Scruton (1996) says low achievement in minorities is because they don't embrace mainstream British culture
Pryce (1979) found that Asian culture makes them more resistant to racism and gives them self-worth, while Black Caribbeans are less resistant, causing low self-esteem and underachievement
Critics are opposed to compensatory education, and instead propose multicultural education and anti-racist education
Cultural deprivation theory
Lack of motivation causes black pupils to fail, they aren't properly socialised into the mainstream culture
CD theorists say this is a reason for ethnic minority pupils' underachievement
Children from poor black families lack intellectual stimulation and enriching experiences, making them ill prepared for school and likely to fail
Bereiter & Engelmann say the language spoken in black families is ungrammatical/disjointed and doesn't express abstract ideas, so it's inadequate for educational success
Concerns about EAL students falling behind are dismissed, as Gillborn & Mirza (2000) say Indian pupils excel despite English being their second language
Sewell (2009)
Black boys' underachieve because of a lack of fatherly nurturing/tough love (firm, fair respectful discipline)
Instead, the fatherless boys turn to street gangs, where they get perverse loyalty & love. Here, their male role model is one of anti-school black masculinity
Sewell says black boys' underachievement comes from their cultural differences in socialisation and poor attitude to education
Academic black boys are labelled 'sell-outs' and subject to peer pressure by the gangs
Gillborn (2008) says the issue isn't peer pressure, it's institutional racism in the education system that is reproducing black boys' failure
Sewell says Indian & Chinese pupils benefit from supportive families that place high value in education
Asian work ethic
Lupton (2004) says the adult authority in Asian families is like the ones in school where children's respect to adults is expected
This has a knock-on effect to school, as Asian parents are more likely to support the behaviour policies
Black pupils are socialised into a 'fatalistic live for today' attitude that doesn't value education, which is why they underachieve
McCulloch (2014) found white working-class pupils also underachieve, and ethnic minorities aspire to university more than the white working-class
Lupton studied 4 working-class schools and found teachers blame lack of parental support for white working-class pupils' failure, as they had no poverty markers like FSM
Evans (2006) argues white working-class street culture is brutal, so pupils learn to withstand intimidation & intimidate others, which causes disruption and educational failure
CD theorists say failing to properly socialise children comes from having a dysfunctional family structure
Moynihan (1965) says black lone mothers struggle with finance without a breadwinner and male role model, so children are deprived of care and model of male achievement, making them fall behind in school and become inadequate parents themselves
Murray (1984) argues high rates of lone parents and lack of male role models leads to minorities' underachievement
Scruton (1996) says low achievement in minorities is because they don't embrace mainstream British culture