The race of the defendant can influence jurors who may stereotypically think that minority ethnic groups are more likely to be involved in crime.
+Bradbury and Williams (2013) found that black defendants are more likely to be convicted if the jury consists of higher numbers of other ethnicity jurors.
The attractiveness of the defendant can influence both the terms of bail and conviction.
+Downs and Lyons (1991) found that in misdemeanor charges, ‘attractive’ defendants received lower bail conditions than those judged as ‘unattractive’.
Mock juries are used to measure the effects of the characteristics of defendants on jury decision making.
-Controlledconditions are used in mock trials where the variables are controlled so the findings about defendant characteristics may lack ecologicalvalidity when considering real trial situations.
Dion, Bersheid, and Walster (1972) claimed that attractiveness is associated with sociallydesirable characteristics and there is a perception that ‘what is beautiful is good’.
+Landy and Aronson (1969) found attractive defendants were treated differently to unattractive defendants, being sentenced less harshly than an unattractive defendant even when rated similarly guilty of a crime.
How attractiveness may influence jury-decision making
A defendant who is deemed to be attractive by the jurors is less