Pre-trial publicity is reports about the crime that took place that are published in the public domain on socialmedia, newspapers or the radio before a case goes to trial.
Steblay et al. (1999) found a significant effect of pre-trial publicity on judgements about the defendant, suggesting that negative information about a defendant and crime can lead to an increased likelihood of a guilty verdict when juries make their decisions.
To test the effects of pre-trial publicity on jury-decision making psychological research has often utilized mockjuries and replicated trials for the investigation process.
In mock jury research there is no real impact from the decision so it may not reflect reallife where jurors consider a range of issues when sentencing a defendant, so research may not reflect the actual impact of pre-trial publicity on decisions made in courts.
Highprofile cases are often more newsworthy due to publicinterest and media values, so they are often reported more widely in the press and socialmedia than every-day criminal cases.
During a trial jurors are requested to disregardpre-trialpublicity and are not allowed to research the case during the trial, therefore there may not be any effect of publicity on a decision, regardless of whether it is a highprofile or lowprofile case.
The credibility of a defendant or victim may be reported in either a negative or positive way by the media in any pre-trial publicity.
Ruva and McEvoy (2008) found that the perception of a defendant’s credibility was higher when pre-trial publicity had been positive, so the impact could lead to jurors making both lenient or harsh decisions about the defendant’s guilt.
DEFINITION
Media/news reports about the defendant/crime/victim published before the trial.