The House of Commons represents all of the UK’s geographical regions.
Each of the 650 MPs represents an average constituency size of 75,000 voters.
MPs spend time in their constituencies meeting people, visiting local businesses, and hold regular ‘surgeries’ where constituents can discuss their concerns.
MPs represent their constituents’ interests in debates and votes.
MP Ken Clarke voted to give Parliament a vote on any Brexit deal reached, as his constituents voted to remain, going against Conservative policy.
Law-Making
House of Commons passes legislation through a number of stages. Laws are debated before being passed.
The government’s planned laws for the year are outlined in the King’s speech. Government bills are often successfully passed by Parliament.
The Data Protection Act (2018) is an example of government legislation, which increased regulation of personal data.
Private Members Bills
Private members’ bills are introduced by MPs and become laws if they pass through the law-making process.
The City of London Corporation Act (2018) is a private members’ bill which allowed the City of London Corporation to have a greater management of open spaces in London.
Legitimation
The House of Commons approves important decisions that impact people in the UK, and has used its legitimacy function to stop, change, and question Government action.
In 2013 the House of Commons voted against military intervention in Syria which was proposed by the Government.
Scrutiny via PMQs
The House of Commons holds the government and ministers to account through Question Times where ministers have to provide answers for the actions of the government.
There are Prime Minister's Questions every Wednesday where the PM is questioned by the Leader of the Opposition and other members of Parliament.
Scrutiny - Select Committes
Departmental Select Committees scrutinise government department work and ministers.
Departmental Select Committees ask more in-depth questions than Question Times.
Nick Hurd, the Home Office Minister, was questioned by the Housing, Communities and Local Government Committee on the support provided for people affected by the Grenfell Tower fire.
The Home Affairs Select Committee investigated a disagreement in 2011 between Theresa May, the Home Secretary at the time, and Brodie Clark, a civil servant, over UK border force failings.
Scrutiny - individual ministerial responsibility
The convention of individual ministerial responsibility holds all ministers in government accountable for the actions of themselves and their department.
Amber Rudd resigned as Home Secretary after she misled the House of Commons over her department’s targets for removing illegal immigrants from the UK.
Law-Making not effective
The process of making laws can take a long time because a bill has to pass through a number of stages before it becomes a law.
The Assaults on Emergency Workers Act (2018), which increased protection for people working for emergency services, took over a year to pass through Parliament and become law.
Private members’ bills often fail to become laws. Only two private members’ bills have passed into law since the 2017 general election.
Law-making not effective due to party whips
MPs cannot always freely debate and vote on laws because the party leadership can tell them to follow the party line.
The government and party leadership use party whips, who are MPs appointed by each party, to force bills through Parliament.
A three-line whip is an instruction for MPs to vote in a certain, party-approved way.
A three-line whip was used by the Conservative Party leadership to order Conservative MPs to vote for triggering Article 50, to begin the process of the UK leaving the EU.
Legitimation
The House of Commons has legitimated Government action which was not in the interests of people in the UK.
The war in Iraq was legitimated by the House of Commons despite lots of public opposition. Over 750,000 people protested in London on a single day in February 2003 against the war.
Scrutiny not effective
Some see Question Time and Prime Minister’s Questions as lacking the power and effectiveness to properly scrutinise the government.
Ministers often avoid directly answering questions.
Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) has been nicknamed ‘Punch and Judy’ politics because it becomes a political shouting match rather than a tool to hold the government to account.
Members of Parliament often ask planted questions at PMQs to make the government and party leaders appear strong to the public.
Scrutiny - Select Committees
Select committee scrutiny can also be ineffective at holding the government to account when ministers are unhelpful in providing evidence when questioned.
In 2016 Boris Johnson, the foreign secretary at the time, was accused of “waffling” by the committee chair of the foreign affairs select committee during questioning.