Social learning theorists agree with the behaviourism principles stating behaviour is learnt through experiences and interactions.
Reinforcement techniques used by social learning theorists are known as vicarious reinforcement and vicarious punishments.
Individuals we observe are referred to as models.
Live models include parents, family and friends.
Symbolic models include characters from books and movies.
Mediational factors:
Social learning theorists (SLT) argue human behaviour can not be fully understood without including the role of the cognitive process that occur between stimuli and responses.
Mediational responses are attention, retention, reproduction and motivation that must occur between observing a model performing a behaviour (stimuli) and imitating that behaviour (response).
Mediational processes:
Attention - Paying attention to said model.
Retention - Remembering the observed behaviours. This involves encoding the observed behaviour so that it can be retrieved later.
Reproduction - Individual's belief in their ability to replicate the behaviour demonstrated by the model (this depends of physical capabilities and remembered details of the behaviour).
Motivation - Willingness to perform the behaviour, influenced by expected outcomes (eg rewards and punishments) based on observing the consequences of behaviour in others.
Bandura and the Bobo doll (1961):
Procedure - Children aged 3-6 divided into two groups. Group A observed an adult showing verbal and physical behaviour towards the Bobo doll in a room full of toys. Group B watched an adult interact non-aggressively with different toys. This was all observed through a one-way mirror.
Findings - Group A was more likely to be aggressive themselves. Identification among boys occurred when they saw an aggressive male rather than aggressive female model.
Bandura - Symbolic models (1963):
In a condition where children were exposed to a live aggressive adult, a recording of an aggressive adult, or a cartoon featuring an aggressive cat all direction their aggression to the Bobo doll, findings showed comparable levels of aggression between all groups, whether live or symbolic, were initiated.
Bandura - Vicarious reinforcement (1965):
Children witnessed adults acting aggressively towards the Bobo doll followed by them receiving rewards (sweets), punishments (hit with a woodengolf club), or neither. Findings showed children who saw the adult being punished were less aggressive than the other conditions.
Strengths of the social learning theory:
Supporting evidence - Bobo doll study has high internal validity due to lab setting. Procedures were standardised. It also used a matched pairs design to control participant variables, assessing pre-existing aggression in participants so each group had an equal mix.
Strengths of the social learning theory:
Less reductionist - Acknowledges the roles of consciousness and rationality, giving a more believable explanation for complex behaviours (eg aggression).
Strengths of the social learning theory:
Theory of 'reciprocal determinism' - A more valid perspective than simpler deterministic approaches. Bandura argued behaviour is not only influenced by environmental factors, but also shaped it. For example, a child's study habits for a test can alter their environment (achieving A grades and receiving praise makes them motivated to increase their efforts).
Limitations of the social learning theory:
Limited explanation and lacks ecological validity - Bandura's research only demonstrated short term learning theory. It was also conducted in a lab setting so may not directly translate to real-world settings.
Limitations of the social learning theory:
Relies on interferences - Processes, such as identification with a model, vicarious reinforcement and mediating cognitive factors are not directly observable and rely on assumptions. These interferences may be incorrect and the true cases of behaviour may be significantly different.