Save
...
Paper one - DONE
families P1
3.2 - aspects and reasons for family and household diversity
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
Molly
Visit profile
Cards (21)
3.2
Woods
and
Smith
decline
in birth rate
1871 =
5.5
per woman
1921 =
2.4
per woman
3.2
Duncan
and
Philips
positives
of divorce
63
% of respondents agreed that divorce can be a
positive
step
forwards
to a
new
life
3.2
Jamieson
commitment through
cohabitation
most couples ages
20-29
stressed their commitment
cohabitation
as
'try and see'
against
individualisation
3.2
Fletcher
value of
marriage
higher
divorce rates linked to
higher
value on marriage as couples expect
compassionate
relationships
3.2
Langford
still looking for
love
women fear being
alone
, love is a
natural bias
for relationships
love conceals the way men exercise
power
and
control
over women
3.2
Hall
et al
freeing young
people are appealed to the idea of being free and focusing on their career
3.2
Greer
changing role of women
decline in popularity of marriage as positive result of women not wanting to be oppressed by their husbands
3.2
Gibson
british
secularisation
religious values
have
weakened
in society leading to a
decline
of value on
marriage
3.2
Beaujouan
and
Brolchain
cohabiting
is the
norm
couples live together
longer
before getting
married
more
opting out
of
marriage
to
cohabit
3.2
Parsons
and
Bales
privatised nuclear
family
modern
American family now
structurally
isolated from
extended
family
3.2
Leach
nuclear family
source of
conflict
nuclear family
is the source of all our
discontent
3.2
Chambers
undeserving
scroungers
divorce
cohabiting
&
lone
parent show dominant moral
decline
3.2
Giddens
transformation of
intimacy
life long
commitment replaced with
confluent
love
3.2
Beck
and
Beck Gernsheim
individualisation
individuals
no longer bound to
societal norms
instead seek
relationships
that suit them
3.2
Park
Changing
social
attitudes
societal pressures changed
sexual partner outside of a marriage is more
acceptable
3.2
Heath
kippers
kids in parents pockets
3.2
Morgan
lack of government support
government don't give enough support to marriage and give too much help to
unfavourable
family types eg
lone parent
3.2
Sharpe
change in
female aspiration
2
working class
girls
studies
- same school
1976 =
prioritised love
,
marriage
and
children
- 67% wanted to live school early
1994 = confident and independent, wanting financial dependency - 67% wanted to stay education
3.2
Allan
and
Crowe
changing position
of
women
main factor in influencing
rise
in number of
divorces
3.2
Duncombe
and
Marsden
double
shift
female
dissatisfaction
married women unhappy with husbands inability to take on responsibilities so end up doing
household
chores and
emotional
load
3.2
Roseneil
and
Budgeon
breaking
down of the
heteronorm