In epidemiology, researchers are interested in measuring or assessing the relationship of exposure with a disease or an outcome
Observational Study Design
Allows nature to take its course. The investigator measures the outcome but does not intervene. It can be descriptive or analytical.
Experimental Study Design
Involves an active attempt to change a disease determinant like exposure or a behavior, progress of a disease through treatment.
Types of epidemiological studies
Observational
Experimental
One type of experimental study is the randomized controlled trial or RCT
Types of epidemiological studies, their alternative names and unit of study
Cohort studies
Case-control studies
Cross-sectional studies
Randomized controlled trials
Experimental Studies
Are cohort studies in which the investigator manipulates the predictor variables (the intervention) and observes the effect on an outcome
Examine the relationship between the predictor and outcome variables in a cohort of subjects followed over time
Experimental Study Research Design
A procedure for devising an experimental setting where in the researcher administers or withholds a factor to see how the dependent variable is affected the independent variable
Variables involved in an experimental study design
Independent variable (predictor variable)
Dependent variable (outcome variable)
Extraneous or confounding variable
Experimental study design is best if the investigator wants to control confounding variables
Experimental study design is recommended and suitable for testing the efficacy of treatment programs
Experimental Study Design
Analytic- statistical analysis can be performed in the extracted data
Longitudinal- there is monitoring of the predictor value (exposure) up to the development of disease (outcome)
Manipulation of the IV by the researcher
Randomization (random allocation)
Use of comparison group
Reference Population
Group of interest
Experimental Population
Group actually studied
Efficacy
Extent to which a specific factor produces a beneficial result under ideal conditions
Effectiveness
Extent to which a specific factor produces a beneficial result when applied in the field practice
Types of Experimental Study Design (according to type of exposure)
Therapeutic
Intervention
Prophylactic
Types of Experimental Study Design (according to unit of analysis)
Clinical Trials
Community Trials
Types of Experimental Study Design (according to type of comparison)
Between Groups Designs
Within-Group Designs
Randomized Controlled Trial
One of the best examples of experimental study design
Steps in Randomized Blinded Trial
1. Select sample from the population (assembling cohort)
2. Measuring Baseline Variables
3. Randomization of Study Subjects
Inclusion Criteria
Refers to the set of qualities that an individual shall possess to be able to qualify to join the research
Exclusion Criteria
The set of characteristics that disqualifies an individual to join the study
Dichotomous outcome
The outcome of interest is not present on the onset of the experiment and will be checked eventually for the progression of the disease. And one exposure is to one disease.
Continuous outcome
The effect of an exposure varies continuously from time to time, the differences in the changes between the measurements shall be computed and be compared from one group to another
Randomization
Allows equal probability among the sample population to be included in a certain group in the study for example if they will be assigned as an experimental or control group
Continuously from time to time, the differences in the changes between the measurements shall be computed and be compared from one group to another
1. Compute differences in changes
2. Compare differences between groups
Study effects of antihypertensive drugs
Use the difference between two groups in the degree of change in blood pressure over the course of the study
Randomization
Cornerstone or identity of randomized blinded trial
Allows equal probability among the sample population to be included in a certain group in the study (e.g. experimental or control group)
Randomization
1. Lottery or fishbowl method
2. Number generating system
Applying Interventions
Compares the outcome in groups of subjects that receive different interventions
Blinding is recommended to prevent the participants from knowing certain information that may influence them
Blinding
Eliminates the influence of confounding variables present at the time of randomization
Does not protect the study from confounding by variables that develop during the period of follow-up
Picking a particular drug or dose or health education procedure from among several promising options when there is no clear basis for knowing which is best
Comparison Group
Choosing the appropriate comparison or control group, it should be clear of any active treatment in a way that can be blinded which usually means by identical placebo
Placebo
A pill or a substance that is given to the control group that has no physical effect on the individual
Follow-up Cohorts (Assuring Compliance)
1. Individuals enrolled in the study to be followed up or monitored from time to time for their adherence
2. Ensure the taste, dosage and duration of the drug shall be well tolerated by the study participant
Measure Outcome Variables
Outcome should be assessed accurately and precisely
Continuous outcome variables have the advantage over dichotomous ones of enhancing the power of the study permitting a smaller sample size
If the outcome is dichotomous, power depends more on the number of events than on the overall number of subjects
Run-in design
Useful design for increasing the proportion of study subjects who comply with the intervention and follow-up procedures
Factorial Design
Answers two separate research questions in a single sample of subjects
Randomization Matched pairs
Pairing participants based on some factors like age sex then randomly assigning which member of each pair goes to the study group