a situation in which an agent perceives themselves as having moral reasons to perform two (or more) different actions, but due to conflicting circumstances, it is not possible to carry out both (or all) actions simultaneously.
moralreasoning
the active or explicit thinking guided by assessments of reasons and rationality requirements, aiming to reach a well-supported answer to a well-defined moral question
moral reasoning
process by which people make judgements about what is the right or wrong action in various problems of a moral nature
moral agent
a being who has the ability to discern right from wrong, make ethical decisions based on it, and be held accountable for his or her own actions.
Kantian version
it is also essential that the agents should have the capacity to rise above their feelings and passions and act for the sake of moral law
obedience and punishment
behavior driven by avoiding punishment
individual interest
behavior driven by self-interest and rewards
interpersonal
driven by social approval
authority
driven by obeying authority and conforming to social order
social contract
driven by balance of social order and individual rights
universal ethics
behavior driven by internal moral principles
post-conventional morality
social contract and universal ethics
conventional morality
interpersonal and authority
preconventional morality
obedience and punishment, individual interest
ethical frameworks
perspectives useful for reasoning what course of action may provide the most moral outcome
ethical theories
important to study in order to establish a strong foundation for challenging situations or guide decisions
ethical theories
we make decisions based on some underlying set of assumptions and philosphy, wether we recognize it or not.