The Court of Appeal has directed that all members of the legal profession who conduct litigation should routinely consider with their clients whether their disputes are suitable for ADR
The court has a duty to manage claims and, in accordance with the overriding objective, must ensure that cases are resolved in a proportionate, expeditious, and fair manner
If the receiving party considers ADR inappropriate, they must set out their reasons, failing which the court has discretion to penalise them in respect of the legal costs that they can recover, regardless of whether their claim is successful
A more formal procedure than negotiation that leads to a final and binding decision capable of enforcement in the courts if not paid
A contractual process, once parties agree to arbitrate they must follow this process unless both parties agree to use another method of dispute resolution
Litigation and ADR are not mutually exclusive and even once proceedings have commenced parties should still be actively considering whether ADR would be appropriate
If parties are concerned there is not enough time to comply with directions and undertake ADR, the court will often suspend the court timetable (formally known as granting a stay) to enable ADR to take place
A 'neutral' is appointed to hear each side's case and to render an opinion of the probable outcome at trial, with the view to encourage settlement of the claim