Reliability

Cards (10)

  • what is reliability?

    • refers to the consistency of a measure
    • a measure is considered reliable if we get the same result repeatedly
    • a research method is considered reliable if we can repeat it and get the same results
  • example of reliability 

    • a ruler would be reliable, as the results could be replicated time after time and the same results would be gained (consistency)
    • some research methods such as laboratory studies have high reliability as they can be replicated and the results checked for consistency
  • example of unreliability 

    • an IQ test may be unreliable, if a person sits the test on a Monday and scores 140, and then sits the same test on Friday and scores 90
    • even though it can be replicated, it shows low consistency and therefore is an unreliable test
    • research methods such as case studies and interviews have lower reliability as they are difficult or impossible to replicate, so we cannot check how consistent the results are
  • experimental methods

    • lab, field, or natural experiments
    • assess reliability by replicating the experiment
    • reliable study = consistent results each time
    • factors that mean the replication of the study is impossible = low reliability
    • e.g. researcher measures stress levels in residents of a town after an earthquake, it would be difficult to replicate the study as researcher wouldn’t have control over when another earthquake might hit
  • non-experimental methods

    • observations, interviews, questionnaires, correlations, content analysis
    • replicated to test for reliability
    • other ways to test their reliability
  • test-retest reliability

    • the measure is administered to the same group of people twice
    • if the results on the two tests are similar, the test is said to have external reliability (when a test/study should consistently produce the same results no matter the time given)
  • split half reliability 

    • splitting a test into two halves, and comparing the scores in both halves
    • if the results in the two halves are similar, we can assume the test is reliable
  • inter-rater reliability

    • if the measure depends interpretation of behaviour, we can compare the results from two or more raters
    • if there is high agreement between the raters, the measure is reliable
  • examples of external reliability
    • a simple example would be if a doctor gave two pregnancy tests to a woman and the results came back positive both times - test is reliable
    • another example would be a maths test - if a student took a maths test twice and got similar results, the test is said to have external reliability
  • internal reliability
    • if there is a strong positive correlation between both halves, the test is said to have internal reliability
    • it is looking at the same test - do all parts of the test have consistent results