An enduring evaluation, positive or negative, of people, objects, or ideas
Types of attitudes
Cognitively Based Attitudes
Affectively Based Attitudes
Behaviorally Based Attitudes
Cognitively Based Attitudes
Attitudes based primarily on people's beliefs about the properties of an attitude object
Affectively Based Attitudes
Attitudes based more on people's feelings and values than on their beliefs about the nature of an attitude object
Behaviorally Based Attitudes
Attitudes based on observations of how one behaves toward an attitude object
Self-Perception Theory
People infer their attitudes from their behavior only under certain conditions
Explicit attitudes
Attitudes that we consciously endorse and can easily report
Implicit attitudes
Attitudes that are involuntary, uncontrollable, and at times unconscious
Attitude accessibility
The strength of the association between an attitude object and a person's evaluation of that object
Theory of Planned Behavior
Idea that people's intentions are the best predictors of their deliberate behaviors
The more specific the attitude toward the behavior in question, the better that attitude can be expected to predict that behavior
Subjective norms
People's beliefs about how others they care about will view the behavior in question
Perceived behavioral control
Intentions influenced by the ease with which people believe they can perform the behavior
When attitudes change, it is often due to social influence
Counter-attitudinal advocacy
Saying becomes believing
Yale Attitude Change Approach
1. Examines the conditions under which people are most likely to change their attitude in response to persuasive messages
2. Focuses on who (the source of the communication) said what (the communication itself) to whom (the audience)
A problem with the Yale Attitude Change approach is that it does not define the conditions under which one aspect of a communication should be emphasized over others
Central route to persuasion
When people are motivated and have the ability to pay attention to the arguments in the communication, they are most persuaded by logically compelling facts
Peripheral route to persuasion
When people do not pay attention to the arguments but are instead swayed by surface characteristics, they are persuaded by things peripheral to the message like how long it is or who is delivering it
Elaboration likelihood model
An explanation of the two ways in which persuasive communications can cause attitude change: central and peripheral
The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion specifies when people will be influenced by what the speech says (i.e., the logic of the arguments) and when they will be influenced by more superficial characteristics (e.g., who gives the speech or how long it is)
Central route to persuasion
When people are motivated and have the ability to pay attention to the arguments in the communication
Most persuaded by logically compelling facts
Peripheral route to persuasion
When people do not pay attention to the arguments but are instead swayed by surface characteristics
Persuaded by things peripheral to the message like how long it is or who is delivering it
Attitude change that is temporary and susceptible to further change occurs in the Peripheral Route
Personal relevance of the topic
How important is the topic to a person's well-being? More personally relevant, pay more attention
When relevance is low
Less motivation to pay attention to arguments, more attention to who is presenting
We can be swayed more by who delivers a persuasive message than by the strength of the message itself, such as when consumers buy certain products because a so-called "influencer" posts about them
When unable to pay close attention, people are swayed more by peripheral cues like the status or likeability of the communicator
People who base their attitudes on a careful analysis of the arguments
More likely to maintain this attitude
More likely to behave consistently with this attitude
More resistant to counterpersuasion
Fear-arousing communications
Persuasive messages that attempt to change people's attitudes by arousing their fears
Strong amounts of fear fail if they overwhelm people, causing them to become defensive, deny the importance of the threat, and unable to think rationally about the issue
How to achieve long-lasting attitude change with fear-arousing communications
1. Try to create enough fear to motivate people to pay attention but not so much that they tune out
2. Include specific recommendations about how to reduce the fear
Heuristic-systematic model of persuasion
An explanation of the two ways in which persuasive communications can cause attitude change: systematically processing the merits of the arguments or using mental shortcuts or heuristics
Heuristics
Mental shortcuts people use to make judgments quickly and efficiently, often using emotions as a heuristic when using the peripheral route
The problem with using the "how do I feel about it?" heuristic is that it can lead to mistakes if people misattribute their feelings to the wrong source
Emotion and different types of attitudes
It is best to "fight fire with fire" - use rational arguments to change cognitively-based attitudes, and emotional appeals to change affectively-based attitudes
Body posture and movements can influence positive or negative feelings and affect attitude change
Describe how advertising changes people's attitudes
Most think it works on others but not them, but people are more influenced by advertising than they think, and advertising can change attitudes
Emotional approach to attitude change
When there is little difference between brands, associate the product with excitement, youth, attractiveness
Laboratory evidence for subliminal influence
Subliminal flashes of words can influence product choice, but requires a controlled environment with correct illumination, no distractions, and right distance from screen