a series of studies which began in the 1960s involving people with epilepsy who had experienced a surgical separation of the hemispheres of their brain to reduce the severity of their epilepsy - enabled researchers to test lateralfunctions of the brain in isolation
Split-brain research -
severing the connections between right hemisphere and left hemisphere
epileptic seizure: brain experiences excessing electricalactivity which travels from 1hemisphere to another
to reduce these connections are cut so hemispheres cant communicate
Spilt-brain research - Sperry's procedure
11 people who had a split-brain operation were studies using a special set-up
an image projected to a ppts right visualfield and same/different image projected to the left visualfield
'normal brain' - corpus callosum would share the information between bothhemispheres giving a complete picture
split brain - information cannot be conveyed from that hemisphere to the other
Split-brain research - Sperry's findings
when the picture of the object shown to a ppts RVF (lh) the ppts could describe what was seen
when the picture shown to LVF (rh) there was 'nothingthere'
connected brain - messages from RH are relayed to languagecentres in the LH
they could select a matching object outofsight using their left hand (rh) + select an object that was most closelyassociated with an object presented to the LVF
if pinup picture was shown to LVF - emotionalreaction but ppts usually reported nothing or flash of light
Split-brain research - Sperry's conclusion
these observations show how certain functions are lateralised in the brain and supports the view that the LH is verbal and the RH is 'silent' but emotional
AO3 split brain research - research support
GAZZANIGA - split brain participants performbetter than connected controls on certain tasks
faster at identifying the oddoneout in an array of similar objects than normal controls
normal = LH's bettercognitive strategies are watered down by RH
AO3 split brain research - generalisation issues
causal relationships are hard to establish
sperry's ppts were compared to a neurotypicalcontrol group - none had epilepsy
major confounding variable
any difference could have been the result of epilepsy rather than split-brain