Articulatory suppression effect suggests existence of 2 separate systems for temporary storage of info, 1 phonological and 1 visuospatial
Fuster (1974)
Monkeys see piece of food, shutter comes down and closes tray, when shutter opens monkey has to remember where food was
Single neuron recordings from PFC showed elevated neuronal firing during delay period - when the shutter is down
Elevated neuronal firing in PFC during delay period shows neurons in PFC hold a representation of the to-be-remembered stimulus
Goldman-Rakic (1987): Standard model of WM
Sustained activation in PFC during delay period of WM task reflects a neuronal WM 'template' - temporary representation of to-be-remembered info
PFC activity reflects neuronal instantiation of Baddeley's WM storage buffers
Direction-specific firing of PFC neurons during delay period shows a direct neurophysiological correlate of WM template - a temp representation of spatial location indicated by cue
PFC holds a representation of to-be-remembered info over short periods of time of WM task
What vs Where in WM
2 types of visuospatial WM - 1 for objects & 1 for spatial locations
General Intelligence (Spearman's 'g' factor)
Correlations in kids between diff disparate measures - academic ability & sensory discrimination
Factor analysis revealed underlying factor common to performance of many different kinds of tasks ('g' factor) - general intelligence
Gf - Fluid intelligence
Reasoning
Problem solving
Gc - Crystallised intelligence
General knowledge
Monkeys are better than humans at working memory
Performance on WM tasks depends on a combo of storage (ST memory) and executive processes (WM)
Working component of WM, not simple STM, predicts fluid intelligence
Fluid, or general, intelligence involves the 'executive attention' component of WM