Intentionally or recklessly causing V to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence
Actus Reus of Assault
The victim must apprehend
Immediate
Unlawful
Personal Violence
Classic example
By raising his fist D causes V to fear that he will use immediate violence
Case: Logdon
The defendant took an imitation gun out of his drawer and pointed it at a woman. The victim was frightened, when D realised this he told her the gun was fake. D was convicted of assault.
Principle: Conviction upheld. - V does not have to be in real danger - V apprehended immediate personal violence (and D was reckless)
Case: Ireland
I made a series of silent telephone calls over three months to three different women. The women suffered psychiatric harm as a result. I was convicted of Occasioning actual bodily harm.
Ireland Principle: Silent telephone calls can amount to an assault
Ireland Principle: The word "immediate" could mean "inaminuteortwo"
Case: Tuberville v Savage [1669]
D put his hand on his sword and stated "if it were not assize-time", I would not take such language from you. Assize-time was when judges were in town for Court sessions.
TubervillevSavage Principle: Words may negate (cancel) a threat of violence
Case: Light [1957]
D raised a sword above his wife's head and said "IF it warnt for the bloody policeman outside, I'd splet your head open!"
Light Principle: Despite D's words, V was not sure of his intention, so Still feared violence -> Assault
Mens Rea of Assault
1. An Intention to cause the victim to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence
OR
2. Being reckless as to whether such apprehension is caused
Examples
Taking a risk that their words/actions could cause V to fear
Raising a Fist
Pointing a gun
Making a verbal threat
Throwing an object that misses V
Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (S.47)
Assault or battery that causes actual bodily harm - any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort
Proposal for Reform: Clause 3 - "Intentionally or recklessly causing injury to V"
Battery
Intentionally or recklessly applying unlawful force upon V
Principle: A battery can be committed by the slightest of touching
Principle: A battery can be committed by an indirect act
Evaluation of Assault
No statutory definition - developed by judges (undemocratic)
Misleading language - e.g. the word 'assault' sounds like it has to involve a physical attack
Certain words have been given a broad meaning e.g. 'immediate'
Same sentence as battery
Proposal for Reform: Rename assault to 'threatened assault'
Evaluation of Battery
No statutory definition - undemocratic
Misleading language - battery sounds like someone has been 'battered' (injured)
There is confusion relating to a battery that causes a small bruise
Same sentence as assault
2015 Proposals for Reform: Rename battery to 'physical assault'
Actual Bodily Harm (ABH)
Any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort
Principle: ABH is not limited to physical injuries but can extend to other hurt and damage
CPS Charging Guidelines for ABH
Bruising
Loss or breaking of a tooth
Temporary loss of consciousness
Broken nose
Minor fractures of bones
Small cuts/scrapes/swelling
Principle: D Must have mens rea for a common assault e.g. The mens rea for an assault or battery
Problems with S.47 (ABH): The terminology used is old fashioned and needs updating
Actual bodily harm' is not defined in the Act, instead it was defined by judges in Miller - unelected
The term 'bodily harm' has been interpreted widely
Proposal for Reform: Rename S.47 to 'Clause 3' - The new offence would be 'intentionally or recklessly caused injury to V'
Principle: For the proposed reform, there will be no need to prove an assault or battery occurring first
The mens rea will correspond with the actus reus (fairer) - to be guilty D must have intended injury or foreseen the risk of injury
Grievous Bodily Harm (GBH)
Serious harm
Principle: Definition of a wound: There must be a break in the continuity of the skin', that is the whole skin (dermis and epidermis) and not merely a scratch to the outer layer of the skin
Internal bleeding is not classified as a wound
Principle: Definition of GBH: Grievous bodily harm means 'serious' harm
CPS Charging Guidelines - GBH
Broken bones
Any injury resulting in permanent disability
Significant permanent disfigurement
Injuries causing substantial loss of blood
Principle: Serious psychiatric injury can amount to GBH
Principle: Infecting someone with an STD such as HIV can amount to GBH
Principle: For S.20 D must either intend or foresee the possibility of some harm
Evaluation of S.20 GBH
The terminology used is old fashioned and needs updating
Parliament have not defined GBH or wound
Judges have broadened the definition of GBH
The mens rea needed for S.20 is harsh/unfair for D
Proposal for Reform: Rename S.20 to Clause 2 - 'Recklessly causing serious injury to V'
Maximum sentence would be 7 years
Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm with intent to do grievous bodily harm (or resist arrest) (S.18)
Must have an intention to cause serious harm (intention to wound not enough)