these are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument.
fallacies
this trick, literally translated as “to the man,” subtly or overtly distorts a person’s character, destroying their credibility no matter how valid their argument is.
ad hominem
it is is an invalid attempt to discredit an opponent by answering criticism with criticism — but never actually presenting a counterargument to the original disputed claim.
tu quoque
this trick implies that the manipulator shares the same views as the audience.
ad populum
this fallacy occurs when someone draws expansive conclusions based on inadequate or insufficient evidence.
hasty generalization
refers to any claim that doesn’t follow from its premises or is supported by irrelevant premises.
it does not follow
non sequitur
non sequitur also known as
irrelevevant reason
it is committed when one argues, without providing adequate evidence, that a relatively insignificant event or course of action will lead to a chain of consequences, eventually resulting in some significant outcome.
slippery slope
this refers to the different ways of fallaciously using the statements or opinions of authority figures in order to support a conclusion.
appeal to authority/ argumentum ad verecundiam
appeal to authority
argumentum ad verecundiam
appeal to pity
ad misericordiam
occurs when a person attempts to gain support for their claim or position by arousing the feeling of pity in their opponent and audience.
appeal to pity / ad miserecordiam
appeal to ignorance
argumentum ad ignorantiam
it is a logical fallacy in which someone argues either for or against something because there is no contradicting evidence. In other words, it’s based on the mistaken assumption that a lack of evidence is evidence.
appeal to ignorance / argumentum as ignorantiam
occurs when your opponent over-simplifies or misrepresents your argument (i.e., setting up a "straw man") to make it easier to attack or refute.
strawman
is an attempt to divert the attention away from the relevant issue by introducing another, irrelevant issue.
red herring / ignoratio elenchi
red herring
ignoratio elenchi
it occurs when a limited number of choices, outcomes, or views are presented as the only possibilities when, in fact, more possibilities exist.
false dichotomy
also known as the either-or fallacy, false dilmme, all-or-nothing fallacy, and black-and-white thinking.
false dichotomy
it occurs when the conclusion of an argument is assumed in one of its premises.
the validity of this type of argument requires its own conclusion to be true.