Midterms: Lesson 9 Fallacies

Cards (20)

  • these  are common errors in reasoning that will undermine the logic of your argument.
    fallacies
  • this trick, literally translated as “to the man,” subtly or overtly distorts a person’s character, destroying their credibility no matter how valid their argument is.
    ad hominem
  • it is is an invalid attempt to discredit an opponent by answering criticism with criticism — but never actually presenting a counterargument to the original disputed claim.
    tu quoque
  •  this trick implies that the manipulator shares the same views as the audience.
    ad populum
  • this fallacy occurs when someone draws expansive conclusions based on inadequate or insufficient evidence.
    hasty generalization
    •  refers to any claim that doesn’t follow from its premises or is supported by irrelevant premises.
    • it does not follow
    non sequitur
  • non sequitur also known as
    irrelevevant reason
  • it is committed when one argues, without providing adequate evidence, that a relatively insignificant event or course of action will lead to a chain of consequences, eventually resulting in some significant outcome.
    slippery slope
  • this refers to the different ways of fallaciously using the statements or opinions of authority figures in order to support a conclusion.
    appeal to authority/ argumentum ad verecundiam
  • appeal to authority
    argumentum ad verecundiam
  • appeal to pity
    ad misericordiam
  •  occurs when a person attempts to gain support for their claim or position by arousing the feeling of pity in their opponent and audience.
    appeal to pity / ad miserecordiam
  • appeal to ignorance
    argumentum ad ignorantiam
  • it  is a logical fallacy in which someone argues either for or against something because there is no contradicting evidence. In other words, it’s based on the mistaken assumption that a lack of evidence is evidence.
    appeal to ignorance / argumentum as ignorantiam
  • occurs when your opponent over-simplifies or misrepresents your argument (i.e., setting up a "straw man") to make it easier to attack or refute.
    strawman
  •  is an attempt to divert the attention away from the relevant issue by introducing another, irrelevant issue.
    red herring / ignoratio elenchi
  • red herring
    ignoratio elenchi
  • it occurs when a limited number of choices, outcomes, or views are presented as the only possibilities when, in fact, more possibilities exist.
    false dichotomy
  • also known as the either-or fallacy, false dilmme, all-or-nothing fallacy, and black-and-white thinking.
    false dichotomy
    • it occurs when the conclusion of an argument is assumed in one of its premises.
    • the validity of this type of argument requires its own conclusion to be true.
    begging the question or petitio principii