A limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that the F-scale is politically biased.
For example, Christie and Jahoda (1954) suggest the F-scale aims to measure tendency towards extreme right-wingideology.
However, right-wing and left-wingauthoritarianism (e.g. Chinese Maoism) both insist on completeobedience to political authority.
This weakens both the validity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as it is not a comprehensivedispositional explanation of obedience to authority because it doesn't explain obedience to left-wing authoritarianism.
Another limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that it is limited.
For example, millions of individuals in Germany displayed obedient and anti-semitic behaviour, but didn't have the samepersonality.
It seems unlikely the majority of Germany's population possessed an authoritarianpersonality.
This weakens both the validity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as an alternative explanation is more realistic; social identity theory. Most Germans identified with the anti-semiticNazi state and adopted its views.
A limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that it is based on a flawedmethodology.
For example, Greenstein (1969) suggests the F-scale is 'a comedy of methodologicalerrors'; items are worded in the same'direction' so the scale just measures the tendency to agree to everything.
Also, researchers knew the participants' testscores when they interviewed them, so they knew who had authoritarian personalities. They also knew the study's hypothesis, which makes biasedresults likely.
This weakens both the internal validity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as it suggests that the data collected is meaningless.
A further limitation of Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation is that much of the research uses correlations.
For example, Adorno measured manyvariables and found significantcorrelations between them; authoritarianism correlated with prejudice against minority groups.
However, no matter how strong a correlation between two variables is, it does not mean that one causes the other.
This weakens both the internalvalidity and support for Adorno's authoritarian personality explanation as Adorno could not claim that harsh parentingstyle caused development of an authoritarianpersonality.