Information collected by sociologists themselves for their own purposes
Primary data collection methods
Social surveys
Participant observation
Experiments
A big advantage of using primary data is that sociologists may be able to gather precisely the information they need to test their hypotheses
A disadvantage of using primary data is that it can often be costly and time consuming
Secondary data
Information that has been collected or created by someone else for their own purposes, but which the sociologist can then use
Sources of secondary data
Official statistics
Documents (letters, emails, diaries, photographs, official reports, novels, newspapers, the internet, television broadcasts)
Using secondary data can be a quick and cheap way of doing research, since someone else has already produced the information
A disadvantage of using secondary data is that those who produce it may not be interested in the same questions as sociologists, and so secondary sources may not provide exactly the information that sociologists need
Quantitative data
Information in a numerical form
Examples of quantitative data
Official statistics on how many girls passed five or more GCSEs
Percentage of marriages ending in divorce
Number of people who are unemployed
Proportion of the electorate intending to vote for a particular party
How many people take holidays abroad
Qualitative data
Information that gives a feel for what something is like
Examples of qualitative data
What it feels like to get good GCSE results
What it feels like for one's marriage to end in divorce
What it feels like to be a member of a particular group
Evidence gathered by using participant observation aims to give us a sense of what it feels like to be a member of a particular group
In-depth interviews that probe deeply into a person's views can give us an insight into what it is like to be in that person's shoes
Types of data
Quantitative data
Qualitative data
Examples of quantitative data sources
Questionnaires
Surveys
Examples of qualitative data sources
Participant observation
Interviews
Examples of secondary data sources
Official statistics
Documents
Different methods and sources of data have different strengths and limitations that need to be evaluated when selecting which to use
Practical issues to consider when selecting research methods
Time and money
Requirements of funding bodies
Personal skills and characteristics
Subject matter
Research opportunity
Ethical issues
Moral issues of right and wrong that the methods sociologists use to study people may raise
Ethical principles for research
Informed consent
Confidentiality and privacy
Harm to research participants
Vulnerable groups
Covert research
Covert research, where the researcher's identity and purpose are hidden from the people being studied, can create serious ethical problems
Theoretical issues
Questions about what we think society is like and whether we can obtain an accurate, truthful picture of it
Validity
The extent to which a method produces a true or genuine picture of what something is really like
Many sociologists argue that qualitative methods such as participant observation give us a more valid or truthful account of what it is like to be a member of a group than quantitative methods such as questionnaires
Reliability
The extent to which a method, when repeated by another researcher, gives the same results
Quantitative methods such as written questionnaires tend to produce more reliable results than qualitative methods such as unstructured interviews
Representativeness
Whether or not the people we study are a typical cross-section of the group we are interested in
Large-scale quantitative surveys that use sophisticated sampling techniques to select their sample are more likely to produce representative data
Representativeness refers to whether or not the people we study are a typical cross-section of the group we are interested in
Positivists
Prefer quantitative data, seek to discover patterns of behaviour and view sociology as a science
Interpretivists
Prefer qualitative data, seek to understand social actors meanings and reject the view that sociology can model it on the natural sciences
Functionalists and Marxists often take a positivist approach. They see society as a large-scale (macro-level) system that shapes our behaviour. By contrast, interactionists take an interpretivist approach. They take a micro-level view of society focusing on small-scale, face-to-face interactions
The sociologist's theoretical perspective is usually an important factor when choosing which method to use
Practical and ethical factors usually impose constraints on the sociologist's choice of method
The sociologist's choice of method may also be influenced by their political standpoint and the growth of knowledge in the field
Sheer chance may also determine the method used
Positivists prefer quantitative data, while interpretivists prefer qualitative data
Positivists
Believe society has an external, objective reality that exerts an influence on members, systematically shaping their behaviour