What is the context behind Finucane for Judicial Review (2019)?
In January 1989, Douglass Hogg, a govt minister made a statement that some solicitors in N.I were "unduly sympathetic to the cause of the IRA"
The UK govt labelled the IRA as a terrorist organisation and criminalised joining or supporting them
Hogg's statement was approved by Thatcher
3 weeks after, Patrick Finucane, a human rights solicitor, who'd represented suspected terrorists was shot dead at home during Sunday dinner in front of his family
Ken Barrett
Member of loyalist paramilitary army and pled guilty in 2004 was released 18 months later
Worked as an informant for the Northern Irish Police Force and worked closely with MI5
William Stobie
A police informant
At his trial, the chief witness backed out and the trial collapsed and he was released
Wanted to publicly testify at an inquiry and would name the officers he worked with
After making this statement, he was shot and killed outside his home
Brian Nelson
A paramilitary member belonging to UDA and was employed by the British Army
Chose targets of assassinations and Finucane
British Army encouraged his course of action
Died in 2003 in witness protection
Who were the three suspects of Finucane's murder?
Brian Nelson, William Stobie and Ken Barrett
What did Sir John Stevens find in his inquiry in 1999?
Found collusion between the British state and Loyalist paramilitaries involved in Finucane's murder
Found collaboration between the Ulster Defence Association (UDA), the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC), and the Force Research Unit (FRU)
Peter Cory's Inquiry
Cory was a retired Canadian judge who investigated accusations of collusion in 2001
Suggested a public inquiry be set up in 2004 but this only happened in 2012
MI5 wiped all the computer hard drives of the Cory inquiry "in the interest of national security"
Sir Desmond da Silva's Inquiry
In 2012, he reviewed the available evidence
Found extensive evidence of state collaboration with loyalist gunmen incl. selection of targets
What was revealed in 2013 concerning Hogg
He was aware of "a systematic problem with loyalist agents" at the time of Finucane's murder
David Cameron's comments
Cameron apologised to the Finucane family for the "shocking levels of state collusion" into Finucane's murder
Finucane's family wanted an open, fair and unbiased public inquiry
Claimed a legitimate expectation based on the assurances given by the UK government between 2004 and 2012
What was the Supreme Court's decision regarding a public inquiry?
Lord Kerr found that there was a "plain and explicit undertaking that a public inquiry would take place"
A public inquiry didn't have to be delivered due to national security
In Nov 2020, Secretary of State for Northern Ireland rejected calls for an inquiry citing ongoing reviews by the PSNI despite the Chief Constable for the PSNI insisting there was no new evidence
What criticisms are made of judicial review based on the outcome of Finucane (2019)
Limited scope of review - some decisions cannot be reviewed if they fall within the discretionary powers of the executive
Lack of accountability
Exhaustion of remedies - this requirement can be time-consuming and costly, deterring some individuals from pursuing judicial review