Conduct by D which causes v to apprehend the infliction of some immediate unlawful force
Max sentence for assault
6 months
What section
S39 criminal justice act 1988
State actus reus elements
An act
Causes v to apprehend
Immediate unlawful force
Describe an Act
- requires some acts or words , omission not sufficient
- ( raising a fist, throwing stone which misses )
- However if V given choice to stop then it's not assault
CONSTANZA - letters capable of assault
IRELAND - silent calls can be assault
Cases to show that words indicating no violence may prevent it from being assault
TUBERVILLE V SAVAGE = ' if it were not a size time, I wouldn't take such language from you ' , no assault as showed he wasn't going to do anything
R V LIGHT = ' if it weren't for police outside I would split your head open' , but wife feared force was going to be used so words weren't enough to negate that fear
Describe how V has to apprehend immediate unlawful force
R v LAMB = pointing unloaded gun at friend who knew unloaded can't be assault as they don't fear immediate violence
LOGDON = imitation gun at V she was terrified so there was assault as V apprehended immediate unlawful force
Immediate
SMITH V WOKING POLICE
- Must cause V to apprehend IMMEDIATE force is going to be used
- no assault if D can't carry out the threat in immediate future which means imminent
Mens rea
- intention to cause another to apprehend immediate unlawful force
- subjective recklessness as to whether such fear is cause
It's a basic intent offence
R v Venna said recklessness to be judged subjectively confirmed in r v parmenter