Attachment

Cards (72)

  • caregiver infant interactions include reciprocity and interactional synchrony
  • reciprocity is an early form of communication featuring turn taking between infant and caregiver
  • reciprocity research - tronick et al
    asked mothers enjoying dialogue with their baby to stop moving and maintain a static unsmiling expression. found babies tried to tempt the mother into interaction by smiling and became increasingly distressed
  • interactional synchrony is when caregiver and infants mirror eachother's facial and body movements
  • interactional synchrony research - meltzoff and moore
    observed infants exposed to 4 stimuli, three facial expressions and one gesture and their responses were observed with video recordings to find they imitated
  • caregiver infant interaction evaluation
    :-) lab studies usually, high control and interrater reliability
    :-( observations aren't useful in understanding child development
    :-( hard to interpret babies behaviour, lack of co-ordination -> researcher bias
  • schaffer and emerson found the majority of babies became attached to their mothers first
  • 75% of the infants schaffer and emerson studied formed an attachment with the father by 18 months
  • grossman found the quality of the childs attachment to the mother but not to fathers was related to attachment in adolescence, suggesting the father as less important
  • however, grossman also found the quality of the fathers play has a different role in attachment - stimulation
  • field found that fathers can take on the role of a more nurturing attachment figure is needed. level of responsiveness is more important than sex
  • multiple attachments and the role of the father evaluation
    :-) biological processes and gender stereotyping - oxytocin and oestrogen
    :-( children growing up in single parent or same sex families don't develop differently
  • schaffer and emerson procedure
    longitudinal study of 60 glaswegian babies
    mothers visited every 4 weeks
    mothers reported their infants responses to seperation in 7 everyday situations
    described intensity of protest
    stranger anxiety also measured
  • schaffer and emerson findings
    25-32 weeks approx 50% showed sep anxiety
    by 40 weeks 80% formed specific attachment
    by 40 weeks 30% formed multiple attachments
  • stages of attachment
    asocial, indiscriminate, specific, multiple
  • asocial stage - first few weeks
    behaviour towards humans and non humans similar
    happier in the presence of humans
  • indiscriminate stage - 2-7 months
    preference for people
    accepts cuddles and comfort from any adult
    no sep or strang anxiety
  • specific stage aka discriminate stage - 7+ months
    babies show sep anxiety
    fear of strangers
    begin forming specific attachments
  • multiple attachments - by one year
    multiple attachments form
  • stages of attachment evaluation
    :-) natural conditions, real life instances of seperation
    :-( indivdualistic! multiple carer cultures may form multiple attachments faster
    :-( incorrect ages, carpenter found infants younger than 6 weeks could distinguish mums face and voice
  • harlows monkeys
    harlow isolated baby monkeys from birth
    placed in cages with access to two surrogate mothers, one made of wire with milk and one covered in cloth without milk
    monkeys spent more time with cloth mother
    conclusion - primary caregiver isn't just satisfying primary drives, 'contact comfort' is just as important
  • harlows monkeys variations
    scaring the monkey - frightening object, took refuge with cloth mother
    no comfort mother - psychological disturbances, no exploration
    placing monkey in large room to play - mothers present, felt safe to explore
    parental behaviours - smashed infants face into the floor and rubbed it back and forth
  • harlows monkeys evaluation
    :-) lab setting
    :-( so unethical - but paradigm shift?
  • lorenz's geese
    divided eggs into two groups, hatched one with mother and one with humans, marked geese to know which is which, placed in upside down box and lifted, observed to see where geese went and they went to who they were hatched with
  • imprinting - 4-25 hours, irreversible. innate and programmed in goslings
  • lorenz geese evaluation
    :-) chicks have been found to do the same even with inanimate objects, regolin and vallortigara simple shape combinations that moved, chicks followed first one they saw
    :-( extrapolation, goslings not humans
    :-( guiton et al found imprinting is reversible, chickens imprinted on yellow washing up gloves tried to mate and eventually learned they weren't chickens
  • the learning theory
    infants are born tabula rasa
    all behaviour is learned not innate
    learns caregiver meets their physiological needs
    classical conditioning
  • classical conditioning schedule
    food (ucs) -> pleasure (ucr)
    food (ucs) + caregiver (ns) -> pleasure
    caregiver (cs) -> pleasure (cr)
  • learning theory evaluation
    :-) watson and raynor backs up classical conditioning, phobias can be learnt so its plausible attachments can be learned too
    :-( attachments formed by 39% of babies was not the person carrying out physical care -> play/responsiveness
    :-( harlows research contradicts. comfort>food?
  • bowlby's theory/evolutionary theory
    ASCMI
    adaptive, social releasers, critical periods, monotropy, internal working model
  • attachment is adaptive as its evolutionary
  • social releasers increase chances of receiving care
  • social releaser examples include cute baby faces
  • critical period is parents instinctive drive to care for infants at their most vulnerable. attachment must form in this time or no future attachments will be formed
  • monotropy is one main attachment, usually with the mother
  • the internal working model is an attachment template for all future relations. aka continuity hypothesis
  • bowlby's theory evaluation
    :-) evidence from lorenz, attachment innate
    :-) hazen and shaver's love quiz supports the iwm
    :-( howes et al - parent child relationships differ from child peer relationships, early attachments do not equal future relationships
  • ainsworth aimed to investigate the individual differences in attachment
  • strange situation
    observed through video camera in lab playroom
    two chairs and set of toys
    8 different situations consisting of mother child and stranger
  • type b
    secure
    70%
    some seperation anxiety but easily soothed, high stranger anxiety, enthusiastic at reunion, high willingness to explore with mother as secure base