For a crime to take place, the actus reus and the mens rea must take place at the same time
How the principle of contemporaneity works
1. Actus reus
2. Mens rea
At the time of the actus reus (driving onto the foot)
The mens rea was lacking
Single transaction theory
The courts may treat a series of acts as one transaction. If the mens rea was present at any time during any of these acts, it can be said to coincide with the actus reus.
Recklessness is a lower level of mens rea than intention
Recklessness is where the defendant knows there is a risk of the consequences happening but takes that risk
Offences for which recklessness is sufficient for the mens rea
Assault and battery
Assault occasioning ABH (s.47 OAPA 1861)
Malicious wounding /GBH (s.20 OAPA 1861)
Arson criminal damage
Cunningham case
Defendant dripped gas from a meter to steal money, causing gas to escape and make a woman ill
Defendant convicted of "maliciously administering a noxious thing"
Malicious
Can either mean intentionally or recklessly
Subjective recklessness test
Defendant not guilty as he himself wasn't aware of the risk