2013 teacher assessments showed girls are ahead of boys in all areas of learning by 7-17 % points
the gender gap is at approximately 10% points (GCSE)
girls do better in maths/physics even though they are 'boy subjects' - more likely to get A-C (A level)
both genders have improved over time, but girls have improvement has been more rapid
external factors to explain trends in girls achievement
impact of feminism
changes in family
changes in women's employment
girls changing ambition
impact of feminism
feminism hasn't achieved full equality but it has been successful in improving women's rights and opportunities
Mcrobbie - did a study of girls magazines, she found in the 70's they emphasise being 'left on the shelves' whereas now women are now shown as independant
feminism has impacted girls self-image for the better
changes in the family
since the 1970s there has been an increase in divorce rate, cohabitation and number of lone parent families - links to Divorce Reform Act (1969) and contraception
more lone parent families = women are breadwinners - financially independent
creates a role model for young girls causes them to want to achieve independence
changes in women's employment
1970 Equal Pay Act - made women have equal pay to men
1975 Sex Discrimination act - outlaws discrimination in the workplace
proportion of women in employment rose from 53%-67% form 1971-2015
gives girls more of an incentive to get qualifications
girls changing ambitions
Sharpe found in the 1970's girls had low aspirations as they prioritised love, marriage and husbands over educational achievement
in the 1990s this changed as girls found having careers and being able to support themselves as more important - saw their futures as independent women
internal factors to explain trends in gender achievement
equal opportunities policies
positive role models in schools
GCSE and coursework
teacher attention
challenging stereotypes in the curriculum
selection and league tables
equal opportunities policies
national curriculum (1988) - removed some gender inequality by making both genders do mostly the same subjects
Jo Boaler - sees the impact of equal opportunties policies as a key reason for changes in girls achievement - barries being removed means education is more meritocratic
positive role models in schools
there has been an increase in the proportion of female teachers and head teachers going from 22% to 27% from 1992-2012 (secondary)
GCSE and coursework
Gorard (2005) found that the gender gap widened in 1989 as this was the year GCSE and coursework were introduced
Mitsos and Browne - girls succeed in coursework as they spend more time on it, therefore they are more organised than boys
however, Elwood argues coursework is unlikely to be the main cause of the gender achievement gap, as exams influence final grades more
teacher attention
French - found boys receive more attention because they attracted more reprimands
Francis - despite boys getting more attention, they were disciplined harshly and teachers picked on them - less expectations for boys
challenging stereotypes
Weiner (1995) argues that since the 1980s , teachers have challenged stereotypes seen in textbooks and other reading materials
sexist images have been removed which raises girls achievement by presenting them more positively
selection and league tables
David and Jackson (1998) notes that the introduction of league tables has improved opportunities for girls, as high achieving girls are attractive to schools
Slee (1998) finds boys are 4x more likely to get excluded
factors causing boys underachievement
boys and literacy
feminisation of education
shortage of male primary school teachers
decline of traditional mens jobs
'laddish' subcultures
boys and literacy
DCSF (2007), the gender gap is mainly the result of boys' poorer literacy and language
parents spend less time reading to their sons
mothers also do most of the reading to young children - makes reading appear more feminine
poor language and literacy skills are likely to affect boys' achievement
feminisation of education
Sewell (2006) reported that boys fall behind because education has 'feminised'
qualities more closely associated with girls are celebrated instead e.g methodical working
shortage of male primary school teachers
the lack of male role models both at home and at school is said to be a cause of boys underachievement
Yougov (2007) 14% of primary school teachers are male and 39% of 8-11 year boys had no lessons with a male teacher
Read (2008) is critical of the claim that education has become more feminised and only male teachers can exert the firm discipline that boys need
decline in traditional men's jobs
since the 1980s there has been a significant decline in heavy industries such as steel and iron - due to globalisation
Mitsos and Browne claim this decline has led to an identity crisis for men - boys have little prospect of getting a job - undermines motivation to get qualifications
'laddish' subcultures
Epstein (1998) - examined the way that masculinity is constructed within school she found - w/class boys are more likely to be harassed and labelled as sissies and subject to homophobic abuse by peers if they appear to be swots
supported by Francis (2001) as boys were more concerned than girls about being labelled as swots - more of a threat to their masculinity
moral panic about boys
critics of feminism argue that policies to promote girls' education are no longer needed and believe girls have succeeded at the expense of boys
Ringrose (2013) argues that these views have contributed to a moral panic about 'failing boys' - it reflects a fear that underachieving w/class boys will grow up to become a dangerous unemployable underclass that threatens social stability
this causes a larger focus on failing boys farther
why do not all girls succeed?
in 2013, only 41% of girls from poorer families achieved 5 A*-C GCSEs, whereas 68% of girls who don't get free school meals achieved 5 A*-C
Archer et al (2010) found one the reasons for social class differences in girls achievement is due to a conflict between w/class girls feminine identities and the schools values and ethos
girls gained symbolic capital through having a hyper-heterosexual feminine identity, having boyfriends and being loud
explanations of gender and subject choice
gender role socialisation
gendered subject images
gender identity and peer pressure
gendered career opportunities
gender role socialisation
this is the process of learning the behaviour expected of males and females in society
Norman (1988) from an early age, boys and girls are dressed differently, given different toys and encouraged to take part in different activities
due to differences in socialisation, boys and girls develop different tastes in reading, therefore subjects
gendered subject images
the gender image of a subject affects who will want to choose it
Leonard - girls in all girls schools are more likely to take maths/science - single sex schools tend to hold less stereotypical subject images
Kelly - science is a boys subject because most teachers are men, textbook examples and resources draw in boys' interests e.t.c
gender identity and peer pressure
w/class pupils in particular may make decisions about vocational courses that are based on a traditional sense of gender identity - childcare courses are 99% female, and engineering are 97% male
Dewar (1990) found that male students would call girls 'lesbian or 'butch' if they appeared to have an interest in sport - this explains why single-sex school pupils will pick non-traditional subjects due to a lack of pressure
gendered career opportunities
different subject choices come from employment have different sex-types
women are concentrated into a narrow range of occupations
Fuller (2011) found placements in feminine, w/class jobs (e.g nursing) were the norm for the w/class girls in her study
how do schools reinforce patriarchy
verbal abuse
teachers and discipline
double standards
verbal abuse
Connell - "a rich vocabulary" of abuse is one way that the dominant gender and sexual identities are reinforced
Paechter - sees name calling as a way to shape gender identity and maintain male power
Parker (1996) - found boys were labelled as 'gay' for being friendly to girl teachers
teachers discipline
teachers also play a role in reinforcing dominant definitions of gender identities
Haywood and Mac an Ghaill (1996) found more male teachers told boys off her behaving like girls - they would also ignore boys verbally abusing girls or blame the girls for it
double standards
Lees (1993) found there is a double standard for sexual morality - boys can boast about sexual exploits, but girls are called slags for not having a steady boyfriend or dressing a certain way
this justifies male power and can be seen as a form of social control