what is a negative evaluation point for research into the role of the SCN as an endogenous pacemaker in the sleep/wake cycle?
ethics - decoursey et al destroyed SCN connections in chipmunks + then returned them to their habitat where changes in sleep/wake cycle led to them being killed
reductionist - every cell in the body has its own pacemaker, influenced by the SCN but can still act independently, so SCN might not be the only endogenous pacemaker in sleep/wake cycle
lacks population validity - research was conducted on animals and the brains of rodents are simpler and not affected by cognitive/emotional issues, so we cannot generalise to humans
lacks ecological validity - only looks at pacemakers which cannot be separated from zeitgebers IRL as they work together