EP's are internal mechanisms that govern biological rhythms, in particular, the circadian sleep-wake cycke.
Although they are biological body clocks, they can be altered and affected by the environment.
For example, although the circadian sleep-wake cycle will continue to function wihtout natural cues from light, research suggests that light is required to reset the cycle every 24 hours.
The SCN receives information about light levels (an exogenous zeitgeber) from the optic nerve, which sets the circadian rhythm so that it is in synchronisation with the rest of the world.
The SCN sends signals to the pineal gland - and so regulates the timing of melatonin release.
This triggers an increase in the production of melatonin at night, which helps induce feelings of sleepiness.
The SCN and the pineal gland therefore work together as endogenous pacemakers. However, their activity is responsive to the external cue of light.
SCN neurons from these abnormal hamsters were transplanted into the brains of normal hamsters, who subsequently displayed the same abnormal circadian rhythm of 20 hours.
This showed that the transplanted SCN had imposed its pattern onto the hamsters.
It was conducted with hamsters. In contrast, humans would respond very differently to manipulations of their biological rhythms, not only because we are different biologically, but also because of the vast differences between environmentalcontexts.
This makes it difficult to extrapolate findings directly to explain the role of endogenous pacemakers in the biological rhythms of humans.
When Siffre returned from spending 61 days underground in a cave without any clocks or natural light, he believed the date to be a month earlier than it actually was.
This suggests that his 24-hour sleep/wake cycle was increased by the lack of external cues, making him believe that one day was longer than it actually was.
This highlights the importance of external cues on biological rhythms. It demonstrates how changes in lightexposure can trigger the desynchronisation of a 'pre-set' sleep/wake cycle.
Despite all the research support for the role of EPs and EZs in regulating biological rhythms, the argument could still be considered biologically reductionist.
The research discussed here could be criticised for being reductionist as it only considers a singularbiologicalmechanism and fails to consider the other widely divergent viewpoints.