Marxism is a structural conflict theory that says society is built upon the ruling class exploiting the working class
The ruling class own the forces of production, while the working class only own their labour, despite producing all the value
Marx says society is divided into two classes - the proletariat (working class) and the bourgeoise (ruling class)
Marx said that as the bourgeoise owned the means of production (resources, land, technology) and the relations of production (workers/labour), they also owned the superstructure - culture, beliefs, values
Marx argued industrialised work was alienating because workers never saw their finished product, only ever working on a small part of the production
Marx said that eventually the proletariat would realise their exploitation and would revolt, overthrowing capitalism and establishing communism instead
Gramsci said the ruling class maintained power through hegemony - beliefs and values passed down to the working class that promoted and justified the ruling class
Althusser suggested the ruling class maintained power through force via the repressive state apparatus - police and laws - and through how people think via ideological state apparatus - ideas, propoganda, friends and family
Elliot argues people are not 'cultural dopes' and are aware they are exploited
Marxism only focuses on economic factors, but there is conflict in society due to other factors
Weber says revolution never happened because society never became polarised - rather, the middle class expanded as a reward for compliance
It could be argued communism in the east failed because it wasn't true communism
Marx's ideas of polarisation can be seen in political parties in the US and UK today
It could be argued the two class systemoversimplifies current economic complexity in the UK
Marxism is often criticised for being out of date. This is something that Neo-Marxists seek to rectify
False class consciousness - proletariat are unable to see their exploitation
Neo-Marxists argue the proletariat can see their exploitation (dual consciousness) but are unable to do anything about it
Neo-Marxism may imply activism is pointless because exploitation cannot be stopped