Judges the rightness of actions based on their consequences, aiming to maximize overall happiness or utility
Classical utilitarianism
Emphasizes the principle of utility as the criterion of morality
Principle of utility
Advocates maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain
Greatest happiness principle
Encapsulates the principle of utility
Act utilitarianism
Evaluates individual actions
Rule utilitarianism
Focuses on the utility of moral rules
Utilitarian principles are applied to various moral and political issues, including healthcare, environmental policy, and distributive justice
Critics challenge utilitarianism on grounds of its treatment of individual rights, its ability to account for justice, and the feasibility of calculating utility
Utilitarian considerations often influence policy decisions, prompting debates over balancing competing interests and ethical considerations
Epicureanism
Advocates for a philosophy of pleasure and tranquility
Ataraxia
State of inner peace and freedom from disturbance
Aponia
Absence of bodily pain
Epicureanism is often misunderstood as a philosophy of indulgence or hedonistic pursuit, whereas Epicurus emphasized moderation and simplicity
Epicurean ethics challenged prevailing notions of happiness and the good life in ancient Greece and continues to inspire contemporary discussions on well-being and fulfillment
Epicurean principles of moderation, self-sufficiency, and tranquility find resonance in contemporary discussions on mindfulness, minimalism, and holistic well-being
Epicurean ethics
Ethical philosophy focused on maximizing pleasure and minimizing pain to achieve a state of tranquility (ataraxia)
Bases of Good in Epicurean ethics
Pleasure (Hedonism)
Absence of Pain
Simple Living
Friendship (Philosophical Companionship)
Utilitarian ethics
Consequentialist ethical theory that prioritizes actions that maximize overall happiness or pleasure and minimize suffering or pain for the greatest number of individuals
Principle of utility
The foundational principle of utilitarianism, stating that actions are morally right if they produce the greatest amount of happiness or pleasure and morally wrong if they produce more suffering or pain
Greatest happiness principle
Also known as the greatest happiness for the greatest number principle, it emphasizes maximizing the overall well-being of the greatest number of people
Utilitarianism often involves quantifying pleasure and pain to evaluate the consequences of actions, though qualitative assessments can also be considered
Act utilitarianism
Evaluates each individual action based on its consequences
Rule utilitarianism
Assesses actions based on adherence to rules or principles that, if universally followed, would lead to the greatest happiness
Utilitarian ethics provides a straightforward framework for making moral decisions by focusing on the consequences of actions and aiming to maximize overall well-being
In pre-modern times, the conceptions of the good were often shared, dictated by culture
In multi-cultural societies of post-modern times, there are always competing conceptions of the good
As a result, conflicts and injustice are readily felt by those whose voices are not heard
Utilitarian formula was too simplistic to address the competing conceptions of good and in some cases amplified the felt injustice
Discourse theory was conceived to provide a way of creating a system of shared conceptions of the good in societies where there are competing conceptions of the good
Principles for Formulating Shared Conceptions
Human beings act in a community and so, one needs the perspective of others
To articulate norms of human behavior, it needs a process of justification (discourse)
It needs to accept that discourse is a process of consensus-building
In consensus, a norm can only be valid if all affected can accept (approval of all affected) the consequences
Consensus
Different from election or votation, and different from making compromises
To ensure fairness in the consensus process
All affected must be part of the process of deliberation
The process must be fair such that all external influences like power and money are suspended and only the force of better argument has influence over the participants
All decisions or agreements have a "for now" characteristic
Common assumption: People can easily judge right and wrong based on their common sense
Moral judgment is often instinctive and unshakable
Differing opinions on moral issues such as wife beating
Common Sense Morality
Instinctive and unshakable moral judgment based on common sense
Cultural Influence on Morality
Moral understanding influenced by social status, ethnicity, generation, historical situation, and gender
Ethical Frameworks
Frameworks constructed from societal and cultural influences
Transcendent Morality
Moral order based on a transcendent authority (e.g., God, cosmos)
Autonomous Morality
Moral order based on human reason and rational consensus