The degree to which being a member of a particular group is prominent and influential in a given context.
When group membership is salient, it significantly affects how we behave, conforming more closely to group norms and expectations.
Social Identity Theory
Social Identity Theory (SIT) was proposed by Henri Tajfel and John Turner in 1972. It suggests that a person’s sense of who they are is based on their group memberships. These groups can include family, friends, social class, team, and nationality.
Key Components:
Social Categorization
Social Identification
Social Comparison
Social Categorization
We categorize people (including ourselves) into groups based on shared characteristics.
This is like sorting books into different genres in a library.
Example: Age groups, nationalities, professions, sports teams
Social Identification
We adopt the identity of the group we categorize ourselves as belonging to.
It's like putting on a uniform that represents your group.
Example: A doctor adopting the language, behavior, and ethics associated with the medical profession
Social Comparison
We compare our groups (ingroups) with other groups (outgroups), typically favoring our own.
This is similar to how sports fans might compare their team to rival teams.
Example: Students from one university believing their institution is superior to others
Key Concepts in SIT:
Ingroups and Outgroups
Positive Distinctiveness
Self-Esteem Hypothesis
Ingroups and Outgroups
Ingroup: The group you identify with
Outgroup: Groups you don't identify with
Positive Distinctiveness
The tendency to view our ingroup more favorably than outgroups.
It's like wearing team-colored glasses that make your team look better.
Self-Esteem Hypothesis
SIT proposes that we strive for positive social identities to boost our self-esteem.
Implications of SIT:
Intergroup Behavior: SIT explains why people might discriminate against outgroups.
Stereotyping: It provides a framework for understanding how stereotypes form and persist.
Group Cohesion: SIT helps explain why people stick with their groups, even when it might not be in their individual best interest.