approach to understanding behaviour that emphasises the importance of subjective experience and each persons capacity for self-determination
free will -
humans can make choices and their behaviour/ thoughts are not determined by internal biological or external forces
people still affected by external and internal influences but are also active agents who can determine their own development
psychologists Roger and Maslow - reject more scientific models
as active agents we are all unique and psychology should concern itself with the study of subjective experience rather than general laws
Maslow's hierarchy of needs -
main interests was in what motivates people - hierarchy of needs
to achieve primary goal of self actualisation a number of other deficiency needs must first be met
bottom: physiological needs such as food and water
middle: safety and security - love and belongingness - self esteem
top: self actualisation
only able to progress through hierarchy once current need in sequence has been met
self-actualisation -
most people have innate desire to achieve full potential
all 4 lower levels of hierarchy (deficiency needs) must be met before the individual can work towards self-actualisation (growth need)
psychologists regard personal growth as an essential part of what it is to be human
personal growth is concerned with developing and changing as a person to become fulfilled, satisfied and goal oriented
important psychological barriers may prevent a person from reaching their potential
the self, congruence and conditions of worth -
Rogers - for personal growth to be achieved individuals concept of self must be broadly equivalent to or have congruence with their ideal self
if too big a gap exists between the 2 'selves' the person will experience a state of incongruence and self actualisation will not be possible due to negative feelings of self worth that arise from incongruence
to reduce gap Rogers developed client-centred therapy - many issues explained by lack of unconditional love from parents in childhood - parents who set conditions of worth cause issues in future
evaluation of humanistic approach: not reductionist (strength) -
P: rejects attempts to break up behaviour and experience into smaller components (reductionism)
E: supporters of cognitive approach see human beings as little more than information-processing machines, biological reduce behaviour to basic physiological processes
E: humanistic psychologists advocate holism - idea that subjective experience can only be understood by considering whole person
L: may have more validity than its alternatives by considering meaningful human behaviour within real world context
evaluation of humanistic approach: not reductionist counterpoint (limitation) -
P: however reductionist approaches may be more scientific
E: because ideal of science is the experiment and experiments reduce behaviour to independent and dependent variables
E: issue with humanistic psychology is that unlike behaviourism there's relatively few concepts that can be broken down to single variables and measured
L: means humanistic psychology in general is short on empirical evidence to support its claims