Isenheim Crucifixion

Cards (29)

  • Mathis Grunewald
    The Crucifixion (from the Insenheim alterpiece)
    1510-15
    Tempera and oil on linden wood
    269 x 307cm
    Unterlinden Museum, France
  • Purpose of an altarpiece
    -          Can convey a narrative – this piece conveys a narrative
  • Gunewald and his painting
    -          Grunewald is an extremely idiosyncratic painter
  • The Isenheim Altarpiece - details and now
    -          The Isenheim Altarpiece
    . a multi-panelled altarpiece- a polyptych
    . composed of 10 painted panels and a predella
    . It has been taken apart now – now shown in a museum in separate parts  
  • First impressions
    • Very gory crucifixion scene – representation of his suffering is clear – his physical torment is clear
    . thick, dripping blood down the cross onto the floor – twisted and distorted hands – malnourished – skin is green is spotted
    . the red can be picked out more because of the red in other scene
    •   Slightly off centre of the polyptych design – but Jesus is the largest (use of hierarchical scene)
    • The background is extremely dark (night) – the foreground is bright and red
    • The background isn’t quite recognisable
    • Small inscription 
  • How has Jesus been presented - background affecting skin
    • The green of the background (water) matches Christ’s skin tone  
    . stony landscape in the foreground by background is a murky and stagnant body of water – this brings out the gangrenous and greenish tinge of Christ’s skin
    • Red and green – complementary colours
  • how has Jesus been presented - his hands and arms
    • Christs arms – abnormally long
    . hands look as if he is clutching onto the final second of life
    . or it could be Rigor mortis – the way the body becomes so rigid when it dies
    . nails drilled through his hands and realistic rendering of the crinkling of the skin and delicate bones at the wrist – contrast the disproportionate length of arms
  • how has Jesus been presented - form
    • we are seeing a deliberate distortion of Christ’s form – figure on the left panel is St Sebastian who is clearly proportioned well – we are not seeing an artist who doesn’t know proportions
    • his knees are bulbus and large – so we can see that he is malnourished
    • his ribcage bulges out and there is very small waist
  • how has Jesus been presented - impact of Mary's in comparison
    • Virgin Mary and Mary Magdaleneintensity of Jesus’ suffering adds to the suffering of others
    • they are both in deep distress – curved backs - coveys suffering - impact of Jesus' suffering
    • Virgin Mary is extremely pale – her paler is extremely distressing to the viewer
    • both of their hands mirror each other – their clenched hands – their hands somewhat allude to the thorns around his head
    • Mary Magdalene – impossible pose of the back bend – she is also very old
  • how is Jesus presented - mirror in colour
    • Each side of Christ is mirrored in terms of colour – red and white
    . overall symmetrical arrangement
  • How has Jesus been presented - John the Baptist
    • John the Baptist is very stoic in his stature – upright - different to Mary's
    • John the Baptist – inscription next to him
    . ‘He must increase, and I must decrease’ – a more positive outlook
  • How has Jesus been presented - tonal
    • Chiaroscuro is used on Jesus
    . there is dramatic lighting and tonal contrasts
    . the tonal contrast highlights Christs starved form
    . the tonal contrast of Mary - pale
  • How has Jesus been presented - setting
    • setting = ominous
    • very barren and hopeless landscape – very desolate
    • this does match the description of St Luke’s gospel – in which the whole land became dark
    • Grunewald experience a full eclipse – maybe is recreating the darkness he experienced
  • How has Jesus been presented - scale of piece
    • Such a large piece
    . so striking – it is prominent and imposing
  • How has Jesus been presented - scale in relation to threat
    • Jesus is not threatening because he is so vulnerable and tortured
    • there is a hierarchical scale – medieval painting technique – showing the importance of Christ
  • How is Christ's suffering shown
    • he is covered in splinters
    • one nail on the foot – shoved through
    • the nails are seeping a thick blood
    • his head is lolling – the physical weight of the dead body
    • his lips are blue and open – in agony
    • his brow is creased – in agony
  • The lamb
    • on Jesus' left
    • lamb spurting blood – reinforces the idea of sacrifice and
  • Where is the piece in relation to other parts of the altar scene
    • a box of statues is enclosed by these folding panels
    • the middle position presents a resurrection scene
    • Our work – the crucifixion scene is on the outer layer
    . seen for the majority of the year 
    • There is a lamentation scene beneath the crucifixion scene
  • Where was the Isenheim Crucifixion originally located
    • an altarpiece for the Antonine order’s monastic complex at Isenheim
    • altarpiece commissioned for the high alter of the hospital chapel in the Catholic monastery of St Anthony
    • The Antonine monks of the monastery were noted for their care of plague sufferers as well as their care for ergotism (or St. Anthony’s Fire)
  • Who commissioned the polyptych?
    • Religious patronage – Guido Guersi
  • Correlation between setting and painting
    • depiction of Christ is related to the setting and the care of the disease that the monastery is looking after
    . the sickness – so much suffering – like Christ
    . there was no cure for it
    • correlation between the iconography of the alter piece and the suffering that was happening in the monastery
    • Another one of the panels depict a demon that shows signs of ergotism
    • other panels show two saints that heal and protect the sick – St. Sebastian and St. Anthony
  • Why is Grunewald showing a suffering Christ - relatable
    • Relatable to those who are suffering in the monastery
    • Grunwald is giving the viewers of the crucifixion a depiction that they could relate to
    . he closes the figure between divine figure and viewer – he is suffering a realistic way
    . his horribly wounded body almost refers to the role of hospital who cares for these extremely sick people
    • the left panel severs Christ’s arm and refers to the amputations of those who suffered with the burning disease
  • Why is Grunewald showing a suffering Christ - hope
    • isn’t wholly horrible – the depiction foreshadows his resurrection – the patients still have their afterlife
    • Give strength to the patients because Christ, in Biblical tradition, endured the most painful death – therefore the patients can
  • Comparison to Renaissance
    • Not like the idealised depiction of Christ in the Italian renaissance depictions
    • body is more muscular and less gruesome slightly less extreme lamentation
    • Grunwald does more suffering depictions of Christ – could reflect the difficulties of living in rural medieval Germany
  • use of suffering - Thomas a Kempis - The Imitation of Christ
    • 15th century writer
    • Kempis states the more suffering you endure you will find Christ
    • the image is giving the viewers a level of hope and identification of Christ being a being in which salvation can be accomplished
    • a painting functioning therapeutically
  • Critic - Honour and Fleming - tortured Christ, this = worst

    ‘Of all the tortured Christs in Western Europe, this makes the most violent impact.'
  • Critic - J-K Huysmans - horror
    • ‘awful horror made by the huge crucified Christ’
  • Critic - J-K Huysmans - modelling from corpses
    'the terrifying realism and meticulous accuracy...obviously modelled on the corpses in the hospital mortuary’
  • Critic - F. Gardner - meaningful

    ‘Grunewald carefully selected and presented his altarpiece’s iconography to be particularly meaningful for viewers at this hospital’