Equalising the grounds (legal reasons behind divorce)
For each sex
When grounds were equaled in 1923 there was a sharp increase in women's divorce petitions
Widening the grounds for divorce
Grounds were widened to include irretrievable breakdown in 1973
Divorce doubled overnight
Making divorce cheaper
Legal aid for divorce was introduced in 1941 so they were more accessible
Changes in attitudes
Previously there was a stigma around divorce (socially frowned upon and churches would refuse to conduct marriages with divorcees)
Since the 1960s there has been a rapid decline in stigma as divorce has become more common and people's reactions are not as strong
Alternatives to divorce aren't as popular now because divorce is much easier to obtain
Desertion
One partner leaves but the couple is legally married
Legal separation
Court separates their financial/legal affairs but they stay married
Empty shell marriage
Couple lives under the same roof but are no longer married
Women's increased financial independence
Women being more likely to seek divorce comes from them no longer being economically dependent on their husband, and therefore able to end an unhappy marriage
Women are more involved in paid work (rose to 67% in 2012 from 53% in 2013)
Equal pay and anti-discriminative laws help reduce pay gap
Girls' educational success now gets them better paid jobs
Welfare benefits more available, women don't have to rely on husbands
Secularisation
The decline of religion's influence in society
Because of secularisation, church's opposition to divorce is a lot less when people are making decisions to end marriage
At the same time, churches have lost their moral authority and credibility in the community
Raising expectations of marriage
People have higher expectations about marriage (ideas of social status and when that lasts so long) so the reality, people are less likely to tolerate an unhappy marriage
Before, people had lower expectations of marriage, they would marry for reasons other than love, and would be more likely to tolerate an unhappy marriage
This functionalist view is criticised for ignoring that divorcees remarry at a high rate and haven't rejected marriage as an institution, and for ignoring women's oppression that leads to conflict and divorce
Feminist explanations for increased divorce
Argue that married women today have a dual burden of paid & domestic work. This is a new source of conflict for husband/wives, so divorce rates are higher
Argue that although societal change has been positive (education, employment, etc.) the private sphere has changed very slowly - marriages remain patriarchal where men benefit from the triple shift
Hochschild (1997) - home is unfavourable when compared to work. Women feel valued at work but men's refusal to do housework is frustrating and makes marriage unstable causing high divorce rates
Bernard (1976) - says divorce rate is higher because women are aware of patriarchal oppression in marriages and are more confident in rejecting them
Changing patterns of divorce
The UK has had an increase in divorce since the 1960s, with a peak in 1992 at 165,000
The rate was 118,000 in 2012, meaning 40% of marriages end in divorce and the rate is 6 times higher than the 1970s
Divorces in the 1990s because people weren't getting married in the first place, instead cohabiting
65% of divorce petitions now come from women, compared to 29% in 1900
Couples who are younger, have children before marriage and cohabit before marriage are more likely to divorce
Modernity & individualisation
Traditional norms like marriage/having a partner for life have less influence over people in modern society
Individualisation thesis - individuals are free to pursue their own self-interest
What does a higher divorce rate mean?
New Right - high rate is negative as it undermines marriage and traditional nuclear family, which are vital to social stability
Feminists - high rate is positive as it shows women becoming free from oppressive patriarchal family
Postmodernists/individualisation thesis - high rate shows individuals have more freedom to end relationships that aren't personally fulfilling
Functionalists - it's not a threat to institution of marriage, just a response to high marriage expectations
Interactionalists - accept problems divorce causes, like women's financial problems and lack of child contact, but say the family can adapt without disintegrating as divorce is normalised