bottom up offender profiling

Cards (11)

  • investigative psychology
    • developed by Canter
    • proposed profiling should be based on psych theory and research
  • interpersonal coherence
    • people are consistent in their behaviour, so there will be links with how people behave in everyday life
    • but may change over time
  • forensic awareness
    • past experience
    • eg. rapists who conceal fingerprints often had previous burglary conviction
  • smallest space analysis
    • statistical technique by Canter
    • data about many crime scenes and offender characteristics are correlated
    • themes: instrumental opportunistic, instrumental cognitive, expressive impulsive
  • geographical profiling
    • analyses locations of connected series of crimes
    • considers where crimes committed, spatial relationships, how this may link to offender's place of residence
  • circle theory
    • Canter and Larkin
    • if crimes are similar in nature and plotted on a map may be possible to join to form circle, criminal would live in centre - marauder
    • commuters - travel to another location, may also commit crimes within defined circles
  • criminal geographic targeting (CGT)
    • Rossmo
    • 3D map showing probability of offender residence
    • jeopardy surface
  • scientific basis of approach
    not as scientific as claimed
    • uses objective statistical techniques and computer analysis (appears scientific)
    • BUT data used to drive systems is based only on caught offenders, doesn't tell us much about unsolved crime
    • also, someone has to develop the systems and may do it wrong
    potential to be scientific, but inevitably biased
  • usefulness of investigative psychology
    is it useful?
    • Copson surveyed 48 UK police forces - 75% said profilers advice useful, only 3% said advice actually helped identify offender
    • most said they'd use again
    may not be useful in catching, but does have slight benefits
  • lack of success of circle theory
    Canter and Larkin study
    • 91% identified as marauders - if almost all not v useful as classification
    Pethrick
    • pointed out flaws - if home not in centre may look in wrong place, circles are oversimplistic may be ellipsis or other
    little usefulness
  • lack of value in geographic profiling
    issue
    • can't distinguish between multiple offenders in one area
    • limited to spatial characteristics, no personality
    • not more useful than simple method of pins on map to see pattern