hungry like a wolf - a word pattern analysis of the language of psychopaths
psychopathy - a personality disorder characterised by a number of traits
factor 1: personality "aggressivenarcissism" - pathological lying, cunning/manipulative, lack of remorse or guilt
factor 2: case history "socially deviant lifestyle" - poor behavioural control, impulsivity, irresponsibility
traits not correlated with either factors - sexual promiscuity, many short-term marital relationships
AbrahamMaslow's Hierarchy of needs - human beings are motivated by needs to self actualise
physiological needs - biological requirements for human survival e.g. air, food and drink
safety needs - experience order, predictability and control in their lives -> fulfilled by family and security, emotional security, law and order
love and belongings - emotional need for interpersonal relationships
esteem needs
selfactualisation needs
Raine et al (2003, 2004) found that psychopaths appear to have a biological basis
Patrick (2006) found psychopaths show no apparent deficits in intellect
Cleckley (1976) observed that the language of psychopaths was more likely to be illogical , contradictory and inconsistent compared to non-psychopaths
aim
test how crime narratives differ between psychopaths and non-psychopathic murderers.
psychopathic speech was analysed on three major characteristics
their instrumental nature (using people and situations to get what they want)
their unique material and socio-economic needs
their emotional deficit (lack of empathy or general lack of emotion about their crime)
sample
52 male murderers - 14 psychopathic and 38 non-psychopathic
imprisoned in Canadian correctional facilities
all ppts admitted their crime and volunteered for the study
did not differ in age, overall mean age at the time of their current homicide was 28.9 years (range 15-40yrs)
similar mean amount of time since their crime - psychopaths mean time 11.87, non-psychopaths 9.82 years
procedure - selection of ppts
potential ppts asked whether they would be interested in taking part in a research study
interested individuals were assessed using Hare's Psychology Checklist-Revised (PCL-R)
the pcl-r assessments were conducted extensively by trained prisonpsychologists or a researcher well trained in the coding of pcl-r
cut off score of 25 to be classed as a psychopath
experiment design
quasi experiment
self-report using semi-structured interviews
procedure - data collection
ppts were interviewed
purpose of the study (to examine the manner in which homicide offenders recall their homicide offence) and procedure was verbally explained
ppts asked to describe their homicide offence in as much detail as possible whilst being audio-taped
interviewers were 2 senior psychology graduate students and 1research assistant, all blind to the psychopathy of the offenders
interviews lasted about 25 minutes
step wise interview technique - used in forensic investigation which attempts to increase the reliability of memory for past events and the validity of intentions for future behaviour, starts off unprompted and later in the interview allows scope for specific questions
procedure - data analysis
audiotapes were transcribed as close to the original as possible, all interviewer comments were deleted and proper nouns and abbreviations were spelled out
W matrix
used to compare parts of speech and to analyse semantic concepts contained in the psychopath and the non-psychopath's narratives - compared the psychopath sample to the non-psychopathic sample, showing any similarities and differences in speech types (use of nouns, adjectives) and the content (emotional states, timings)
Dictionary of Affect in Language (DAL)
used to examine the emotional properties of language such as positivity, intensity and imagery
results
both psychopaths and control group produced a total of 127,376 words and there was no significant difference in the average number of words between the groups
results - their instrumental nature
psychopaths view the world and others instrumentally and this was reflected in their language which shows they are motivated to achieve an external goal
use subordinating conjunctions more like 'because', 'since', 'so that' associated with cause and effect statements
results - their unique material and socio-emotional needs
satisfying their basic physiological and material needs matters more to psychopaths than satisfying higher level needs
non-psychopaths used significantly more words connected to family and religion
results - emotional deficit
struggle to describe their crimes in a manner that seems appropriate to others due to the lack of empathy for victims emotions and lack of emotions themselves.
psychopaths viewed their crime as more in the past and more psychologically distant than the non-psychopaths
conclusion
psychopaths:
more likely to describe cause and effect relationships when describing their murder
view their crime as a logical outcome of a plan
focus more on physiological needs than higher level social needs
linguistically frame their homicide as more in the past and more psychologically distant
less emotionally intense descriptions of their crimes and use less emotionally pleasant language
research method - strength
gather large amounts of detail and in-depth data about individuals compared to questionnaires
research method - weakness
time intensive to gather data compared to questionnaires -> fewer participants
sample - strength
relatively large number of prisoners interviewed
produced huge amounts of data for statistical analysis which improves the representativeness of the research
sample - weakness
unrepresentative as all ppts were Canadian prisoners - ethnocentric
all ppts were male making it difficult to generalise to a female population - androcentric
introduced bias possibly as the sample is unlikely to represent murderers in prison who chose not to participate
qualitative data - strength
large amount of qualitative data was produced from individual interview recordings - captured the richness of language used to describe each homicide -> allows researchers to study the difference between psychopaths and non-psychopaths in great depth
qualitative data - weakness
audio-taped narratives in raw form were too detailed and varied to allow direct comparison
quantitative data - strength
overall view of differences in language between two groups
ethics - strength
confidentiality maintained
informed consent was gained through volunteer sampling - consideration of circumstances of ppts' imprisonment and how it may affect their abilities to freely consent to contribute to the study
full verbal brief at the outset of each interview
reliability - strength
interview procedure can be replicated
random checks by another researcher confirmed a higher level of inter-rater reliability
validity - strength
good ecological validity - ppts were interviewed about their own real-life crimes -> provided detailed and in-depth accounts
interviewing technique was designed specifically to avoid asking leading questions and to allow ppts to speak freely
highly valid measures to determine psychopathy (PCL-R) and linguistic analysis tools (Wmatrix and DAL) - tested for validity and provides concurrent validity -> used extensively in other research
validity - weakness
some ppts were interviewed more than a decade after their crimes
social desirability bias may reduce validity of the responses as ppts might have wanted to appear remorseful
practical applications
understanding the language of psychopaths reveals personality and behavioural traits that set them apart from the general population
potential to help identify psychopaths and deal with them effectively - psychopaths reveal an emotional distance from their crimes and motivations linked to basic needs
key differences can be considered by those working in criminal justice system -> appropriate ways to rehabilitate psychopathic criminals