The idea that nature & nurture are linked to such extent that is doesn't make sense to separate the two, so researchers instead study how they interact & influence each other.
How does PKU support the interactionist position?
Nurture element -> Causes brain damage if given protein - diet. If child is diagnosed, then can be given a special diet & no brain damage occurs. The NHS tests very child at birth. Nature elements -> Inherited condition (2 recessive genes). Can't break down amino acids in food.
How does epi-genetics support the interactionist position?
Epi-genetics refers to changes in our genetic activity without changing our own genetic code caused by environmental factors. Aspects of our lifestyle & the events we encounter from smoking, diets or stressful life events, eg. terrorist attacks can leave epigenetic marks on our DNA. These may impact on the turning on & off of certain genes which may even go onto influence the genetic code of our offspring.
Dias - interactionist approach
Mice were conditioned to fear a perfume smell due to being given electric shocks, however this caused the same fear in their offspring without any conditioning at all. They were even born with more cherry-blossom- detecting neurons in their noses & more brain space devoted to cherry-blossom-smelling. This experience has altered the genetic activity
Groothest - interactionist approach
Meta-analysis of 28 studies. Higher concordance rates for OCD for MZ twins. Concordance rate not 100% so suggests there must be some environmental influence as well. Biological predisposition -> low serotonin levels, leaky basal ganglia Environmental factor -> stress
Meaney - interactionist approach
Studies licking & grooming behaviour of rats towards pups
Mix of nature & nurture, eg. genotype & phenotype & epi-genetics. Supported by the cognitive approach, phenotypes, epi-genetics & the diathesis-stress model to help explain schizophrenia.