Until 1980s UK population growth was largely the product of natural change that is the result of there being more births than deaths. However since then most growth comes from migration
There has been a long term decline in numbers of births since 1900 but figure shows that there has been fluctuations in births with three baby booms in the 20th century. 1st - after the two world wars (1914-1918, 1939-1945) 2nd 1960s/1970s and 3rd 1990s
In recent years the Uks TFR has risen but is still much lower than in the past - 1960s 2.95 children per women, 2001 1.63 children per women, 20014 1.83 children per women, 2019 1.65 children per women
Harper argues the education of women is the most important reason for the long term fall in birth rates and fertility rates. It has changed the mind set of women resulting in them having fewer children
Harper also noted that once a pattern of low fertility lasts for more than a generation the cultural norms of family size change. Smaller families become the norm and large one could be seen as deviant or less acceptable
Pull factor - they are attracted by the pull of being child free, especially the increased freedom and better relationships with partners that it affords. Married couples without children have more disposable income
Push factors - they may experience a push away from motherhood. Women who tended to see parenting as conflicting with their leisure or career interests were disinterested
In 1900, the IMR for the UK was 154 (15% of babies died within the first year). These figures are higher than those of less developed countries today e.g. Afghanistan 2014 IMR 117
As a result of all the above developments by 1950 the Uk's IMR had fallen to 30 and by 2012 it stood at 4 - barely one fortieth of its 1900 figure. In 2020 the uk IMR stood at 3.5
However many sociologists claim that failing IMR led to a fall in birth rates, Brass and Kabir 1978 argue that the trend to smaller families began not in rural areas where the IMR first began to fall but in urban areas where the IMR remained higher for longer
Laws banning children labour, introducing compulsory schooling and raising the school leaving age means that children remain economically development on their parents for longer and longer
Changing norms about what children have a right to expect from their parents in material terms mean that the cost of bringing up a child has risen
The increasing child-centredness both of the family and of society as a whole means that childhood is socially constructed as a uniquely important period in the individual's life
In terms of family size, this has encouraged a shift from 'quantity' to 'quality' parents now have fewer children and lavish more attention and resources on these few
Mothers from outside the UK have a higher fertility rate than those born in the UK. Babies born to mothers from outside the UK accounted for 25% of all births in 2011
The proportion of the population who are of working age compared with the proportion who are not working and therefore dependent others (children and the retired)
Fewer babies being born has impacted public services and policies in several ways. For instance fewer schools, maternity and child health services may be needed. Cost of maternity and paternity leave and housing is impacted. Lastly a rising ageing population
Males born in England in 1900 Could expect on average to live until they were 50 (57 for female). Males born in England in 2013 can expect to live for 90.7 years (94 years for females)
Harper predicts That we will soon achieve 'radical longevity' With many more centuries people aged over 100. Currently there are about 10,000 in the UK;By 2100 There Are predicted to be 1, million