Inherited genotypes make display of criminal behaviour in the phenotype more likely
Family Studies
Twin and Adoption studies try to show people with biological criminal relations are more likely to be criminals
Osborne and West (1979) - 40% of sons with criminal fathers committed a crime before age 18, compared to 13% of control
Candidate Genes - Tiihonen (2014)
Studied 900 offenders in Finland and found that 2 genes may be responsible for criminality
MAOA gene which controls for serotonin and dopamine in the brain is linked with aggression
CDH13 gene is linked to substance abuse and ADHD
Diathesis-Stress Model - Caspi (2002)
Some genes only expressed due to an interaction with the environment
Study of 1000 people since birth from 1970s
Found within men who had commited antisocial behaviour, 12% had low MAOA genes and had experienced child abuse
Neural Explanation
Biological processes / neural structures within the brain lead to crime
Prefrontal Cortex - Raine (2000)
Brain scanning images showed that those with APD have reduced activity in the prefrontal cortex, which regulates emotional and moral behaviour
Also found an 11% reduction in grey matter
Mirror Neurons - Keysers (2011)
Found that when criminals were asked to empathise did their mirror neurons activate, suggesting they can turn empathy on and off
(+) A03: Rhee (2002)
51 twin and adoption studies in a large meta-analysis
Genetics accounted for 41% of variance in anti-social behaviour
Statistics being in-line with Osborne and West, suggesting a biological influence
(-) A03: Biological Determinism
Socially sensitive as it can be used to justify discriminative activities; Lawyers use the arguement of genetics to justify no control of actions in crime
(-) A03: Reductionist, Limited Explanation
Valid understanding would also consider drug abuse, childhood etc; hard to generalise to non-violent crimes such as fraud or bigamy, making crime a social construction, hard to explain in terms of genes