The theory that Germany industrialised rapidly in the late 19th century but did not democratise
Sonderweg theory
Proposed by Fritz Fischer and Hans Ulrich-Wehler
Argues that industrialisation in Germany was very successful and coincided with the period of autocracy under the kaisers
Germany was powerful because of an efficient civilservice and 'reform' from above (e.g. unification of 1871)
Reached a climax in the years leading up to 1914
German autocrats were successful in rewriting the narrative of World War One not least through the myth of Dolchstosslegende (teleology)
The weakness of liberal democracy continued to be a powerful force in German political thinking
These attitudes hindered the development of liberal democracy and facilitated the rise of Nazism which was never the intended outcome of the autocrats within German policy
Meta-narrative
The theory that Germany is instinctively autocratic and predisposed, with a natural psyche to associate autocracy with success, underpinning all events
Postmodernist view
Rejects the meta-narrative
Works with more granular theories of Johnson & Gellately, Peukert
Rejects tautology
Rejects 'great man history'
Need to look at history from the bottom-up
Criticism of Sonderweg theory
By Geoffrey Eley and David Blackburn
Dismissed Sonderweg theory as a western view of history
Argued for normalisation and evolution of democracy