Study the reciprocal arrangements between plants and their environment
Goal of plant ecologists
Understand how climate, soil or edaphic, and biotic factors affect plant growth, development, and distribution
Ecology
The study of the interactions between individuals and their environment
Weed ecology
Differs from ecology only in that the organisms being studied are weeds
Weed scientists
Concerned with how weed management affects weed and crop growth and development
Weed ecology
Gives special emphasis to the adaptive mechanisms that enable weeds to survive and prosper under conditions of maximum disturbance
Studies the growth and adaptations that enable weeds to exploit niches in environments disturbed by people who must practice agriculture
The most successful weed management programs will be developed on a foundation of adequate ecological understanding
Three important weed-environment interactions
Climate
Soil
Biota or living organisms
Association of weeds and crops
Determined largely by the degree of competition offered by a particular crop and weed
Degree of competition
Affected by biotic factors such as plant composition, diseases occurrence, toxins released, and animals to which includes insects, the soil fauna, and of course man
Important factors that determine a weed's ecological interactions
Light
Temperature
Water
Wind
Humidity
Seasonal aspects - the climate
Purple nutsedge
Thrives in humid tropics and subtropics with some into sub-humid temperate regions
Yellow nutsedge
Does well in sub-humid tropics and warm, temperate regions
Light intensity, quality, and duration
Affect weed presence and survival
Photoperiodic responses govern flowering and determine the time of seed maturation
If light is too intense or days too long or short, particular weeds won't flower and a species may not endure
Temperature, particularly soil temperature
A primary determinant of seed germination and survival
Air and soil temperature are important determinants of species distribution and ecological interactions
Weeds are found in the environment they prefer, and weed control or weed management often may be aided with changing the environment
Irrigation and tillage are major environmental changes that lead to shifts in species composition in the affected areas
Edaphic
Comes from the Greek edaphos, meaning "soil" or "ground"
Soil factors
Water
Aeration
Temperature
pH
Fertility
Fertility sources
Cropping system and associated practices
Many weeds do well in soils too low in fertility for crop production, but others grow only in well-fertilized soil
Most weeds can be found in soils differing widely in physical characteristics, moisture content, and pH
Soil pH is an important determinant of what plants grow in an area, but no generalizations can be made about the influence of pH on weeds
The effect of soil structure, water-holding capacity, texture, and nutrient level are also important factors in determining weed growth
Field topography such as altitude, slope that determines sun exposure also determine of what weeds grow
Competition
A negative form of interaction where individuals make simultaneous demands that exceed limited resources and , which both suffer, one individual suffers less
Competition between crops and weeds
Why weeds are controlled
If weeds were just there and benign, we wouldn't care as much about them
They cause harm to crops by competing with them
Weeds have the capacity to obtain more water in the soil because they have more extensive root system that can penetrate deeper layer of the soil to extract water and nutrients
Leaf area index (LAI)
The total leaf area per unit ground area
Quantifies the amount of leaf material in a canopy
Importance of LAI
For canopy light harvest
Phenology
Canopy structure
Transpiration
Scaling processes
Relationship of light transmission and LAI
The higher the LAI (meaning more leaf density) the lesser the light transmission
Factors that affect the magnitude of crop-weed competition
For weeds: species, density, distribution, and the length of time that the weed is present in an area
For crops: density, its distribution (including spacing between rows and spacing in the row), and duration (when thinning/weeding will be implemented)
All these factors (both crops and weeds) are modified by soil (edaphic) and climatic conditions
Differences in competitive ability of weed species and biotypes
Brassica sp. (wild mustard) can reduce the yield of sugarbeet more than Setaria glauca (yellow foxtail)
Convolvulus arvensis (bindweed), a perennial weed, was found to be more competitive than annual weed species because of their deep roots and early, heavy shoot growth
Characteristics that make weeds more competitive
Germination patterns differ markedly and sometimes erratically, causing differences in their potential for competition from year to year
Emergence and growth also vary from slow and even, to rapid and almost unpredictable
Different species and biotypes appear to respond differentially to various environmental conditions
Phenotypic plasticity
The ability of an organism to change its phenotype in response to environmental conditions
Weeds that emerge with the crop must be removed before the end of Period 1 (maximum weed-infested period) to prevent them from reducing crop yield
The crop must be kept clean throughout Period 2 (the critical period for weed–crop competition)
Later emerging weeds (Period 3) have little effect on crop yield
Early literatures assumed that crop yield and weed density was linear, which is not correct
Zimdahl (1980) proposed that the relationship was curvilinear, which is also wrong as it fails to predict that at high density crop yield will be reduced to zero
Sigmoidal relationship between crop yield and weed density
At very low weed densities, there is no effect on crop yield, and as weed density increases, while there may be effect it is not very obvious
As weed density continues to increase, crop yield drops quickly but never goes completely to zero
Even at very high densities, weeds do not eliminate all crop plants
It is very difficult to measure the effect of weeds especially in a large area
Allelopathy
First coined by Molisch in 1937, who is considered as the father of allelopathy
The term was refined by Rice (1984) and in 1996, the International Allelopathy Society broaden the definition of allelopathy