personal life 4 criticisms on structural theories views on family
research is ethnocentric - focus on white middle class families
assumes nuclear family is dominant type
portray families and passive and solely influenced by external societal factors
ignore broader social trends and meaningful non-familial relationships
personal life criticism of postmodernist view on family
argue the view that people can make their own choices free from societal pressure and influence is idealistic, and individuals are still influenced by complex societal pressures and previous relationship experiences
is personal life a structural or postmodern approach
neither - lies inbetween
SMART - connectedness thesis
people form meaningful connections with friends, colleagues and pets
these bonds can be stronger than family relations as they are based on shared experiences rather than just bloodlines
people are free to construct their own individual family network, but the choices they make are influenced by family history, social class, ethnicity, expectations etc
smart - 4 concept roles important to individuals and their relationships with others
role of memory
role of biography
role of embeddedness
role of relationality
smart - role of memory and importance to individuals and their relationships
bonds formed on basis of shared memories
memories of certain life events can be painful or joyful
people form different relationships with individuals with whom they share different memories
smart - role of biography and importance to individuals and their relationships
each relationship has its own individual history and aspects which can determine the formation and importance of that relationship
shared history in education, work, travel etc can often create stronger connections than blood relations
smart - role of embeddedness and importance to individuals and their relationships
strength of a relationship depends on social arrangements and time spent together
people are often closer to a friend they see every day compared to a family member they see occasionally
smart - role of relationality and importance to individuals and their relationships
relationships nature and health are important
people generally like to avoid conflict so surround themselves with like--minded individuals
individuals may experience constant conflict with families and search for refuge among friends and colleagues
may - increase in single person households
increasing number of single person households and changes in society results in people seeking both physical and emotion support from outside their families and creating their own personal networks
may include family members, friends, colleagues, pets etc
weeks - same-sex couples and family diversity
construction of homosexuality is abnormal and the establishment of gender roles led to the nuclear family led by heterosexual couples being considered the only legitimate family form for a long time
tipper - pets
studied children's evaluation of family relationships and found kids often regarded pets as part of the family
positives of personal life perspective
shows independent ways in which people establish and define 'family' relationships
recognises relatedness is not always positive
evaluation of personal life perspective
too broad a view
looks at a wide range of relationships so ignores what is special about blood / marriage based relationships
process by which traditional social relationships, bonds, values and customs that used to strongly regulate people's lives in the narrowest detail have been losing more of their meaning and influence
people have more options, choice and opportunities to decide for themselves how to shape their lives
bauman - individualisation thesis
in a world of growing individualisation, uncertainty and constant change, kinship networks are frail and human bonds are weak, and people are constantly searching for security
this involves new ways of living their personal lives, leading to growth in a wide diversity of family and personal living arrangements
beck-gernsheim - individualisation thesis
underlying causes of growing individualisation lie in developments in modern medicine such as contraception and artificial insemination, which enable sexuality and reproduction to be separate entities
growth of individualisation has meant it is no longer clear who or what is part of the family:
people talk of partners > husbands and wives
artificial insemination, sperm banks and surrogacy = concept of parenthood unclear
family names no longer denote a family as people may keep, change or double barrel names