The EU is the most integrated organisation in the world, but also a very contrasted one
Why the EU can be considered the most integrated region in the world
Political integration
Economic integration
Main steps of EU integration
1. First an economic union (Treaty of Rome 1957)
2. 1986: Single European Act, first step towards a single market
3. 1992 Maastricht → European Union
EU functions like a supranational state
Representatives, a budget, a currency (for some members), a nationality, increasingly standardised regulations
There is a deep trend of political integration in the EU, even if it is criticised by some as a denial of sovereignty and democracy
Economic integration of the EU
Critical mass through enlargements
Development of a strong single market: free circulation of capital, goods, people
Many European countries use the Euro, the second most-used currency in the global economy
The EU is the biggest regional organisation of HICs and has a lot of global economic influence
EU economic partnerships
AELE members
Middle-Eastern, North-African countries
Asian and Pacific countries
CETA with Canada 2017, JEFTA with Japan 2019, Singapore 2019, Mercosur-EU 2019
The EU is the first region in terms of FDI (inwards and outwards)
The EU lacks a common foreign/military policy, no army, no diplomacy, no defence policy
The EU wants to be a normative power
A power that promotes good practice, supports developing countries, develops humanist values = more soft than hard power
The EU is the 1st contributor to the budget of the UN and the 1st contributor to development aid
The EU has had a spectacular enlargement (broader integration) and political union (deeper integration)
Some consider the EU's integration is too deep
The values of the EU are debated, with some members (Visegrad group) wanting only economic integration
Reaching consensus is difficult in the large EU union
The EU is under pressure from other powers trying to force their own values onto Europe
The EU uses regional scale (NUTS) for statistical analysis and policies, which is seen by some as a sign of the weakening of the national scale
Economic disparities in the EU
West-east contrast (former communist countries)
Richer regions in the centre of the EU, with peripheries
Funds from the ERDF show the latest EU members receive the most subsidies
Regional disparities have been decreasing when considering the EU as a whole, but increasing within some countries
The transition of former communist countries to match the liberal standards of the EU was a long-term structural adjustment that required time and money
Some very unequal countries in the EU are Romania, Bulgaria and Lithuania
Every EU state has "inner peripheries" like the rural Mezzogiorno in Italy, former East-Germany, East of Bulgaria or Romania
Lagging regions
Regions that suffer from low growth or low income, often post-industrial or rural areas with high unemployment, poor infrastructure, lack of skilled workforce and hampered accessibility
There is a concentration of wealth in most capital city regions in the EU
Some argue the disparities in the EU are what make it economically efficient, as the integration of poorer countries in the 2000s helped cope with Asian competition
Core/periphery model
The core and periphery regions in the EU depend on each other, it's not a strictly one-way relation
Unequal integration in the EU
Some areas are cores (well integrated, dynamic, interconnected regions)
Other regions are remote and isolated, especially in the East of the continent
Some regions near the core are suffering from deindustrialisation and outsourcing
The enlargement of the EU to Eastern Europe was seen by some as a way for TNCs to outsource without being dependent on Asia
Bulgaria is the poorest country in the EU, with low wages as its main competitive advantage, but also a strategic location and EU subsidies to support its integration
Dahrendorf's quandary/Rodrik's trilemma
It is impossible to combine economic competitiveness with social cohesion or political freedom
The EU aims to combine competitiveness and cohesion, but is often seen as promoting neoliberal policies that betray this original promise
The EU has a considerable capacity for collective engagement but projects are diffusely managed
Dahrendorf's quandary
Dilemma where it is impossible to combine economic competitiveness with social cohesion or political freedom
Maintaining EU competitiveness in globalisation
Requires implementing policies that are detrimental to cohesion
The combination of cohesion and competitiveness is hard to achieve ("managed globalisation"), but the EU considers it as representative of its objectives
Since the 2008 crisis especially, the EU is often seen as a promoter of neoliberal policies that betray the original promise of managed globalisation
Europe has a considerable capacity for collective engagement but projects are diffusely managed (huge diversity of objectives, structures and management)
No European country is powerful enough on its own to compete against giants such as China, India or the US
Territorial cohesion
The main objective today for making the EU more cohesive
Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T)
Example of a key competitiveness policy implemented by the EU