Intentional and direct (unlawful) interference with a persons possession of land
What needs to be intentional for trespass?
the direct action rather than the intent
-e.g stepping onto someones land, even if you didn't know it was theirs
Where does direct interference of trespass extend to?
-beyond the surface of the land
Star Energy Weald Basin Ltd v Bocardo SA [2010]
-above the land (into airspace)
Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco [1975]
Anchor Brewhouse Developments v Berkley House [1987]
Esso Petroleum v Southport Corp
d discharged oil, polluting shorelines in order to avoid the ship sinking
use of the necessity defence for trespass was successful
Southwark LBC v Williams
a sufficient degree of peril is needed for the necessity defence to succeed
affirmed in Monsanto plc v Tilly
trespass abinitio
occurs when a person enters land with authority given by law and subsequently commits an act that is an abuse of that authority
the six carpenters
found that a wrongful act committed after lawful entry onto someones premises could make the original entry a trespass
BUT Elias v Pasmore held that the trespass only applied to the wrongful act and did not render the original entry illegal
Types of physical interference with land:
crossing a boundary onto land
remaining on land
going beyond what is permitted while on someones land
putting or placing objects on someones land
LeagueagainstCruelSports v Scott
hunting dogs strayed onto c's land, held to be an implied intention to trespass as he was "indifferen[t] to such incursions while persisting to hunt near the claimant’s property"
AnchorBrewhouseDevelopments v BerkleyHouse
the arm of a crane was found to be a trespass, despite it being non-permanent
Bernstein v Skyviews
held that it cannot be a trespass if it above the level of an ordinary user of land
StarEnergyWealdBasin Ltd v Bocardo SA
held that the trespass which was 800-2,800ft underground was 'far from being so deep as to reach the point of absurdity'