some adaptions that are sexually selected for such as peacock feathers may be selected due to sexual selection, however can be a disadvantage when surviving such as escaping predators
research by cunningham (1986) found that men were attracted to images of youthful faces (large eyes, small noses, and chins)
research by singh (1993) shows a cross cultural preference for a 0.7 hip to waist ratio
evolutionary approach may be criticised as legitimatising a gender double standard between men and women, sexual differences may have been exaggerated (alpha bias)
research in this area could be seen as socially sensitive, findings could be used as justification for shaming women for their sexual behaviour
evolutionary explanations for sexual selection can also be criticised for not explaining homosexual partner preference